These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36534241)
1. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose. Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected. Ahmed SA; Samy M; Ali AM; Hassan RA Radiol Med; 2022 Jan; 127(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34665431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review. Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive Predictive Value of Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsies of Architectural Distortions Seen on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and without an Ultrasound Correlate. Vijayaraghavan GR; Newburg A; Vedantham S J Clin Imaging Sci; 2019; 9():53. PubMed ID: 31819830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortions: Correlations between Imaging Characteristics and Histopathologic Outcomes. Romanucci G; Fornasa F; Caneva A; Rossati C; Mandarà M; Tommasini O; Rella R J Imaging; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37233322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience. Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography. Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Positive Predictive Value of Architectural Distortion Detected with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in BI-RADS 4 Cases. Dou E; Ksepka M; Dodelzon K; Shingala PY; Katzen JT J Breast Imaging; 2020 Nov; 2(6):552-560. PubMed ID: 38424858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography. Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography. Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management. Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Challenge of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortion of the Breast: Inter-reader Variability and Imaging Characteristics That May Improve Positive Predictive Value. Feliciano-Rivera YZ; Net J; Velamuri S; Pluguez-Turull C; Yepes MM J Breast Imaging; 2022 Jun; 4(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 38416967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Obtaining a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Spot Compression View on Assessment of Equivocal DBT Findings. Deleau F; Linck PA; Brouste V; Thomassin-Naggara I; Depetiteville MP; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Chamming's F AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 35170358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions. Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis. Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Architectural Distortion on Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Pathologic Outcomes and Indicators of Malignancy. Wadhwa A; Majidi SS; Cherian S; Dykstra DS; Deitch SG; Hansen C; Bhave S; Koch KM J Breast Imaging; 2021 Jan; 3(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 38424835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion. Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]