These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36534697)

  • 1. Benefits of Text Supplementation on Sentence Recognition and Subjective Ratings With and Without Facial Cues for Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Zhong L; Ricketts TA; Roberts RA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):682-696. PubMed ID: 36534697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.
    Mackersie CL; MacPhee IX; Heldt EW
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25170782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
    Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
    Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of text supplementation on speech intelligibility for listeners with normal and impaired hearing: a systematic review with implications for telecommunication.
    Zhong L; Noud BP; Pruitt H; Marcrum SC; Picou EM
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 34154488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Auditory Task Type on Physiological and Subjective Measures of Listening Effort in Individuals With Normal Hearing.
    Lau MK; Hicks C; Kroll T; Zupancic S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1549-1560. PubMed ID: 31063438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language.
    Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.