These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36534933)

  • 1. Digitalizing the Clinical Research Informed Consent Process: Assessing the Participant Experience in Comparison With Traditional Paper-Based Methods.
    Buckley MT; O'Shea MR; Kundu S; Lipitz-Snyderman A; Kuperman G; Shah S; Iasonos A; Houston C; Terzulli SL; Lengfellner JM; Sabbatini P
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e355-e364. PubMed ID: 36534933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study.
    Corneli A; Starling S; Choi Y; Vosylius J; Madre L; Mackinnon A; Tenaerts P
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2024 Jan; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 38233932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of Electronic Informed Consent Platforms for Consenting Patients to Research Studies: A Scoping Review.
    Guarino J; Parvanova I; Finkelstein J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():777-781. PubMed ID: 35673123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.
    De Sutter E; Lalova-Spinks T; Borry P; Valcke P; Kindt E; Negrouk A; Verhenneman G; Derèze JJ; Storme R; Huys I
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():995688. PubMed ID: 36237540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study.
    Zondag AGM; Hollestelle MJ; van der Graaf R; Nathoe HM; van Solinge WW; Bots ML; Vernooij RWM; Haitjema S;
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e54867. PubMed ID: 38990640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informing a European guidance framework on electronic informed consent in clinical research: a qualitative study.
    De Sutter E; Borry P; Huys I; Barbier L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Feb; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 36810088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views.
    De Sutter E; Borry P; Geerts D; Huys I
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.
    Cohen E; Byrom B; Becher A; Jörntén-Karlsson M; Mackenzie AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e43883. PubMed ID: 37656499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.
    Doerr M; Maguire Truong A; Bot BM; Wilbanks J; Suver C; Mangravite LM
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing and Practical Implementation of a User-Friendly Personalized and Long-Term Electronic Informed Consent Prototype in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.
    De Sutter E; Geerts D; Yskout K; Verreydt S; Borry P; Barbier L; Huys I
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e46306. PubMed ID: 38113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of an Educational and Interactive Informed Consent Process on Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
    Lee YS; Cho DC; Sung JK; Han I; Kim CH; Kim JY; Kim KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 31513103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.
    De Sutter E; Verreydt S; Yskout K; Geerts D; Borry P; Outtier A; Ferrante M; Vandermeulen C; Vanmechelen N; Van der Schueren B; Huys I
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):296. PubMed ID: 36397108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of Videos Improves Informed Consent Comprehension in Web-Based Surveys Among Internet-Using Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hall EW; Sanchez TH; Stein AD; Stephenson R; Zlotorzynska M; Sineath RC; Sullivan PS
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e64. PubMed ID: 28264794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.
    De Sutter E; Coopmans B; Vanendert F; Dooms M; Allegaert K; Borry P; Huys I
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():724431. PubMed ID: 34540773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.
    Skelton E; Drey N; Rutherford M; Ayers S; Malamateniou C
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104271. PubMed ID: 32979650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.
    Rothwell E; Wong B; Rose NC; Anderson R; Fedor B; Stark LA; Botkin JR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 25747685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
    Montalvo W; Larson E
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study.
    Simon CM; Schartz HA; Rosenthal GE; Eisenstein EL; Klein DW
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):338-348. PubMed ID: 29790410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.