BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3653495)

  • 1. Insertion forces with intrauterine devices: implications for uterine perforation.
    Goldstuck ND
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Aug; 25(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 3653495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine perforation by copper intrauterine device.
    Heinonen PK; Merikari M; Paavonen J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1984 Jun; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 6378687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perforation of the uterus by the copper-t and copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Cederqvist LL; Lindhe BA; Fuchs F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1975; 54(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 1169868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string.
    Zakin D; Stern WZ; Rosenblatt R
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1981 Jul; 36(7):335-53. PubMed ID: 7029368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine perforation by the intra-uterine device.
    Raman S; Sivanesaratnam V; Sinnathuray TA
    Med J Malaysia; 1981 Sep; 36(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 7199110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translocation of the Dalkon Shield into the broad ligament.
    Cederqvist LL; Sarry ZI; Zervoudakis IA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 1171420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices.
    Heartwell SF; Schlesselman S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 6823347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25601352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine perforation by a Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device with subsequent penetration of the appendix. Case report.
    McWhinney NA; Jarrett R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Aug; 90(8):774-6. PubMed ID: 6349675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature.
    Chen CP; Hsu TC; Wang W
    Contraception; 1998 Nov; 58(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 9883385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Removal from the abdominal cavity of an intrauterine device by culdoscopy].
    Acosta Bendek E
    Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 28(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 565069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
    Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.
    Zakin D; Stern WZ; Rosenblatt R
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1981 Aug; 36(8):401-17. PubMed ID: 6455610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative randomized study of the copper-T 200 and Dalkon Shield intrauterine devices.
    Spellacy WN; Birk SA; Gordon L
    Contraception; 1975 Oct; 12(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 1192734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Intrauterine contraception (IUD) and uterine perforation].
    Henriksen HM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1978 Oct; 140(40):2436-7. PubMed ID: 695087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine perforation by the multiload CU250 intra-uterine device.
    Raman S; Sivanesaratnam V
    Med J Malaysia; 1982 Mar; 37(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 6889674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Randomized comparison of clinical performance of two copper-releasing IUDs, NOVA-T and Copper-T-200, in Denmark, Finland and Sweden with a special reference on pelvic infection].
    Luukkainen T; Nelsen NC; Nygren KG; Piorala T
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1979 Jul; 7(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 12335998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine contraceptives devices.
    McKenna PJ; Mylotte MJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Feb; 89(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 6461352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies in translocation. Dalkon Shield - insertion, perforation, and migration.
    Horbelt DV; Roberts DK; Adamson HW
    J Kans Med Soc; 1979 Jun; 80(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 572391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.