167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36535100)
1. Flow-based method demonstrates improved accuracy for calculating wall shear stress in arterial flows from 4D flow MRI data.
Hurd ER; Iffrig E; Jiang D; Oshinski JN; Timmins LH
J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 146():111413. PubMed ID: 36535100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel and facile criterion to assess the accuracy of WSS estimation by 4D flow MRI.
Ko S; Yang B; Cho JH; Lee J; Song S
Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():95-103. PubMed ID: 30743192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wall Shear Stress Estimation for 4D Flow MRI Using Navier-Stokes Equation Correction.
Zhang J; Rothenberger SM; Brindise MC; Markl M; Rayz VL; Vlachos PP
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1810-1825. PubMed ID: 35943617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards quantitative evaluation of wall shear stress from 4D flow imaging.
Levilly S; Castagna M; Idier J; Bonnefoy F; Le Touzé D; Moussaoui S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Serfaty JM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():232-243. PubMed ID: 32889090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Examining Complex Hemodynamics in the Carotid Artery Bifurcation.
El Sayed R; Sharifi A; Park CC; Haussen DC; Allen JW; Oshinski JN
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Jun; 14(3):476-488. PubMed ID: 37156900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Method for estimating pulsatile wall shear stress from one-dimensional velocity waveforms.
Muskat JC; Babbs CF; Goergen CJ; Rayz VL
Physiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 11(7):e15628. PubMed ID: 37066977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a System for Measuring Wall Shear Stress in Blood Vessels using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Yoshida K; Nagao T; Okada K; Miyazaki S; Yang X; Yamazaki Y; Murase K
Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):136-49. PubMed ID: 18367824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of PC MRI velocity maps: pulsatile flow in cylindrical vessels.
Robertson MB; Köhler U; Hoskins PR; Marshall I
Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun; 19(5):685-95. PubMed ID: 11672627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review.
Szajer J; Ho-Shon K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 48():62-69. PubMed ID: 29223732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wall Shear Stress Assessment of the False Lumen in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Visualized by 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ex-Vivo Study.
Veger HTC; Pasveer EH; Westenberg JJM; Wever JJ; van Eps RGS
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2021 Oct; 55(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 34078199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions.
Papathanasopoulou P; Zhao S; Köhler U; Robertson MB; Long Q; Hoskins P; Xu XY; Marshall I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12541221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice of in vivo versus idealized velocity boundary conditions influences physiologically relevant flow patterns in a subject-specific simulation of flow in the human carotid bifurcation.
Wake AK; Oshinski JN; Tannenbaum AR; Giddens DP
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):021013. PubMed ID: 19102572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of blood flow rheology using second-grade viscoelastic model (Phan-Thien-Tanner) within carotid artery.
Ramiar A; Larimi MM; Ranjbar AA
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(3):27-41. PubMed ID: 29205216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-modality approach for enhancing 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging via sparse representation.
Zhang J; Brindise MC; Rothenberger SM; Markl M; Rayz VL; Vlachos PP
J R Soc Interface; 2022 Jan; 19(186):20210751. PubMed ID: 35042385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of 4D flow MRI velocity field in the aorta with divergence-free smoothing.
Gao Q; Liu X; Wang H; Wu P; Jin M; Wei R; Wang W; Niu Z; Zhao S; Li F
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Nov; 59(11-12):2237-2252. PubMed ID: 34528164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 4D model of hemodynamics in the abdominal aorta.
Zbicinski I; Veshkina N; Stefańczyk L
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S257-64. PubMed ID: 26406010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-periodicity of blood flow and its influence on wall shear stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: An in vivo measurement-based computational study.
Zhou X; Yin L; Xu L; Liang F
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109617. PubMed ID: 31959390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
