These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36536205)
1. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity. Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias. Kim H; Anderson BA Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture. Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search. Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning. Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J; Bogaerts L Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 37491558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learned prioritization yields attentional biases through selection history. Munneke J; E Corbett J; van der Burg E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2244-2256. PubMed ID: 31974938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation. Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring. Kim A; Anderson B Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 35112310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. You do it to yourself: Attentional capture by threat-signaling stimuli persists even when entirely counterproductive. Mikhael S; Watson P; Anderson BA; Le Pelley ME Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 34843309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues. Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Failing M; Theeuwes J Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27926. PubMed ID: 22132170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]