These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36536206)

  • 1. Internal attention is the only retroactive mechanism for controlling precision in working memory.
    Serin F; Günseli E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1375-1386. PubMed ID: 36536206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of attentional biases on multiple working memory precision parameters for children and adults.
    Shimi A; Scerif G
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13213. PubMed ID: 34897919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory.
    Günseli E; Fahrenfort JJ; van Moorselaar D; Daoultzis KC; Meeter M; Olivers CNL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13499. PubMed ID: 31534150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1839-60. PubMed ID: 27098647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Wascher E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():73-85. PubMed ID: 28847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures.
    Jeanneret S; Bartsch LM; Vergauwe E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1486-1498. PubMed ID: 37127814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Graded Fate of Unattended Stimulus Representations in Visuospatial Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Dalmaijer ES; Verguts T; Husain M; Fias W
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():374. PubMed ID: 30863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retroactive Attentional Shifts Predict Performance in a Working Memory Task: Evidence by Lateralized EEG Patterns.
    Göddertz A; Klatt LI; Mertes C; Schneider D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():428. PubMed ID: 30405380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is refreshing in working memory impaired in older age? Evidence from the retro-cue paradigm.
    Loaiza VM; Souza AS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):175-189. PubMed ID: 29635867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diverting the focus of attention in working memory through a perceptual task.
    Gao Z; Li J; Wu J; Dai A; Liao H; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):876-905. PubMed ID: 35084929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity.
    Kuo BC
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1564. PubMed ID: 27774082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection within working memory impairs perceptual detection.
    Macedo-Pascual J; Capilla A; Campo P; Hinojosa JA; Poch C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1442-1451. PubMed ID: 36596909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits.
    Niklaus M; Singmann H; Oberauer K
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():282-302. PubMed ID: 30551034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.