These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36536206)

  • 21. Flexibility of representational states in working memory.
    Zokaei N; Ning S; Manohar S; Feredoes E; Husain M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():853. PubMed ID: 25414654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1237-56. PubMed ID: 24730737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Benefit of Attention-to-Memory Depends on the Interplay of Memory Capacity and Memory Load.
    Lim SJ; Wöstmann M; Geweke F; Obleser J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():184. PubMed ID: 29520246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural and behavioral evidence supporting the relationship between habitual exercise and working memory precision in healthy young adults.
    Yuan X; Li D; Hu Y; Qi M; Kong Y; Zhao C; Huang J; Song Y
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1146465. PubMed ID: 37090810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.
    Ester EF; Nouri A; Rodriguez L
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8538-8548. PubMed ID: 30126971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):715-738. PubMed ID: 35297019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task.
    Poth CH
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 32206936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Mar; 124():47-56. PubMed ID: 28115199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect.
    Lin YT; Sasin E; Fougnie D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 33608857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. No evidence that the retro-cue benefit requires reallocation of memory resources.
    Lin YT; Fougnie D
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105230. PubMed ID: 36007468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):2977-2989. PubMed ID: 35696178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A dual mechanism underlying retroactive shifts of auditory spatial attention: dissociating target- and distractor-related modulations of alpha lateralization.
    Klatt LI; Getzmann S; Begau A; Schneider D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13860. PubMed ID: 32807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.
    Ye C; Hu Z; Ristaniemi T; Gendron M; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35573. PubMed ID: 27774983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.