These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36538168)
1. Empirical validation of QUEST+ in PSE and JND estimations in visual discrimination tasks. Paire A; Hillairet de Boisferon A; Paeye C Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3984-4001. PubMed ID: 36538168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications. Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods. Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychophysics with children: Investigating the effects of attentional lapses on threshold estimates. Manning C; Jones PR; Dekker TM; Pellicano E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 29582387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function. King-Smith PE; Rose D Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QUEST+: A general multidimensional Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Watson AB J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):10. PubMed ID: 28355623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function? Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of Taste Recognition Threshold Measurements with Höchenberger R; Ohla K Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31861903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Klein SA Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method. Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Anderson AJ Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation. Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA Spat Vis; 2007; 20(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 17524255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma. Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 87(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12488273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Random Step Method for Measuring the Point of Subjective Equality. Wang P; Reynaud A Vision (Basel); 2023 Nov; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 37987294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staircase procedure and constant stimuli method in cat psychophysics. De Weerd P; Vandenbussche E; Orban GA Behav Brain Res; 1990 Nov; 40(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 2285478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual working memory for amplitude-modulated shapes. Salmela VR; Lähde M; Saarinen J J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):2. PubMed ID: 22661608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]