191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36538386)
1. Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pathology Diagnosis Demonstrates Significant Gains in Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection.
Raciti P; Sue J; Retamero JA; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Thiagarajan D; Ebrahimzadeh Z; Viret J; Lee D; Schüffler PJ; DeMuth G; Gulturk E; Kanan C; Rothrock B; Reis-Filho J; Klimstra DS; Reuter V; Fuchs TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Oct; 147(10):1178-1185. PubMed ID: 36538386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of A Computer-Aided Detection Software for Prostate Cancer Prediction: Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy Independent of Preanalytical Factors.
Vazzano J; Johansson D; Hu K; Eurén K; Elfwing S; Parwani A; Zhou M
Lab Invest; 2023 Dec; 103(12):100257. PubMed ID: 37813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Intelligence Helps Pathologists Increase Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency in the Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastases.
Retamero JA; Gulturk E; Bozkurt A; Liu S; Gorgan M; Moral L; Horton M; Parke A; Malfroid K; Sue J; Rothrock B; Oakley G; DeMuth G; Millar E; Fuchs TJ; Klimstra DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38809272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies.
Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A
Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.
Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial Intelligence-Based Screening for Mycobacteria in Whole-Slide Images of Tissue Samples.
Pantanowitz L; Wu U; Seigh L; LoPresti E; Yeh FC; Salgia P; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Chen WY; Hartman D; Yeh CY
Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 156(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 33527136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies.
Fine JL; Grzybicki DM; Silowash R; Ho J; Gilbertson JR; Anthony L; Wilson R; Parwani AV; Bastacky SI; Epstein JI; Jukic DM
Hum Pathol; 2008 Apr; 39(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 18234276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A promising deep learning-assistive algorithm for histopathological screening of colorectal cancer.
Ho C; Zhao Z; Chen XF; Sauer J; Saraf SA; Jialdasani R; Taghipour K; Sathe A; Khor LY; Lim KH; Leow WQ
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2222. PubMed ID: 35140318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and multi-institutional validation of an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy.
Abe H; Kurose Y; Takahama S; Kume A; Nishida S; Fukasawa M; Yasunaga Y; Ushiku T; Ninomiya Y; Yoshizawa A; Murao K; Sato S; Kitsuregawa M; Harada T; Kitagawa M; Fukayama M;
Cancer Sci; 2022 Oct; 113(10):3608-3617. PubMed ID: 36068652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
