These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Evaluation of A Computer-Aided Detection Software for Prostate Cancer Prediction: Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy Independent of Preanalytical Factors. Vazzano J; Johansson D; Hu K; Eurén K; Elfwing S; Parwani A; Zhou M Lab Invest; 2023 Dec; 103(12):100257. PubMed ID: 37813279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial Intelligence Helps Pathologists Increase Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency in the Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastases. Retamero JA; Gulturk E; Bozkurt A; Liu S; Gorgan M; Moral L; Horton M; Parke A; Malfroid K; Sue J; Rothrock B; Oakley G; DeMuth G; Millar E; Fuchs TJ; Klimstra DS Am J Surg Pathol; 2024 Jul; 48(7):846-854. PubMed ID: 38809272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification. Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies. Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study. Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies. Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens. Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies. Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study. Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images. Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies. Fine JL; Grzybicki DM; Silowash R; Ho J; Gilbertson JR; Anthony L; Wilson R; Parwani AV; Bastacky SI; Epstein JI; Jukic DM Hum Pathol; 2008 Apr; 39(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 18234276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A promising deep learning-assistive algorithm for histopathological screening of colorectal cancer. Ho C; Zhao Z; Chen XF; Sauer J; Saraf SA; Jialdasani R; Taghipour K; Sathe A; Khor LY; Lim KH; Leow WQ Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2222. PubMed ID: 35140318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and multi-institutional validation of an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy. Abe H; Kurose Y; Takahama S; Kume A; Nishida S; Fukasawa M; Yasunaga Y; Ushiku T; Ninomiya Y; Yoshizawa A; Murao K; Sato S; Kitsuregawa M; Harada T; Kitagawa M; Fukayama M; Cancer Sci; 2022 Oct; 113(10):3608-3617. PubMed ID: 36068652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study. Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]