167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36538387)
41. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer.
Wolff AC; Somerfield MR; Dowsett M; Hammond MEH; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Saphner TJ; Spears PA; Allison KH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 147(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 37303228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Does Specimen Type Have an Impact on HER2 Status in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma? Discordant HER2 Status of Paired Endometrial Biopsy and Hysterectomy Specimens in the Presence of Frequent Intratumoral Heterogeneity.
Rottmann D; Assem H; Matsumoto N; Wong S; Hui P; Buza N
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 May; 40(3):263-271. PubMed ID: 32897955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system.
Gown AM; Goldstein LC; Barry TS; Kussick SJ; Kandalaft PL; Kim PM; Tse CC
Mod Pathol; 2008 Oct; 21(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 18487992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features.
Stewart RL; Caron JE; Gulbahce EH; Factor RE; Geiersbach KB; Downs-Kelly E
Mod Pathol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1561-1566. PubMed ID: 28752841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma: Current state and clinical perspectives.
Navarro Sanchez JM; Finkelman BS; Turner BM; Katerji H; Wang X; Varghese S; Wang T; Peng Y; Hicks DG; Zhang H
Am J Clin Pathol; 2023 Oct; 160(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 37267036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessing the impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma.
Murray C; Flanagan L; D'Arcy C; Gullo G; Quinn CM
Virchows Arch; 2020 Mar; 476(3):367-372. PubMed ID: 31375912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Detailed Reanalysis of 500 Breast Cancers With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Borderline ERBB2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Del Rosario KM; Meyer RG; Spears GM; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Jenkins RB; Ocal IT; Mounajjed T; Chen B
Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Oct; 156(5):886-894. PubMed ID: 33942843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Impact of 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines on HER2 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing in Breast Cancers : Experience From a National Reference Laboratory.
Gulbahce HE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Oct; 148(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 28967951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dual-color dual-hapten in situ hybridization (D-DISH) - Comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2/neu testing in breast cancer.
Gajaria PK; Tambe S; Pai T; Patil A; Desai SB; Shet TM
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 32317514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Quantitative Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) Practice Guideline Update on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.
Wei CH; Garcia L; Murata-Collins J; Schmolze D; Apple S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):887-890. PubMed ID: 33112946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Targeting HER2 in colorectal cancer: The landscape of amplification and short variant mutations in ERBB2 and ERBB3.
Ross JS; Fakih M; Ali SM; Elvin JA; Schrock AB; Suh J; Vergilio JA; Ramkissoon S; Severson E; Daniel S; Fabrizio D; Frampton G; Sun J; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Gay LM
Cancer; 2018 Apr; 124(7):1358-1373. PubMed ID: 29338072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
Mohanlal RD; Bouwer N; Willem P
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Sep; 31(8):555-560. PubMed ID: 37471623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Focused Update.
Gordian-Arroyo AM; Zynger DL; Tozbikian GH
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 152(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 30958889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in invasive breast cancer: should histological grade, type and oestrogen receptor status influence the decision to repeat testing?
Rakha EA; Pigera M; Shin SJ; D'Alfonso T; Ellis IO; Lee AH
Histopathology; 2016 Jul; 69(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26542743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. HER2 immunohistochemistry significantly overestimates HER2 amplification in uterine papillary serous carcinomas.
Mentrikoski MJ; Stoler MH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 24698965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for colorectal cancer: results from a validation study.
Valtorta E; Martino C; Sartore-Bianchi A; Penaullt-Llorca F; Viale G; Risio M; Rugge M; Grigioni W; Bencardino K; Lonardi S; Zagonel V; Leone F; Noe J; Ciardiello F; Pinto C; Labianca R; Mosconi S; Graiff C; Aprile G; Frau B; Garufi C; Loupakis F; Racca P; Tonini G; Lauricella C; Veronese S; Truini M; Siena S; Marsoni S; Gambacorta M
Mod Pathol; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 26449765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
