149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36538521)
1. Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
Neves K; Tan PB; Amaral OB
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277935. PubMed ID: 36538521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction.
Bom PRD; Rachinger H
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 31039283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
Schneck A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision-making in research tasks with sequential testing.
Pfeiffer T; Rand DG; Dreber A
PLoS One; 2009; 4(2):e4607. PubMed ID: 19240797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery.
McElreath R; Smaldino PE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136088. PubMed ID: 26308448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Funnel plots may show asymmetry in the absence of publication bias with continuous outcomes dependent on baseline risk: presentation of a new publication bias test.
Doleman B; Freeman SC; Lund JN; Williams JP; Sutton AJ
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):522-534. PubMed ID: 32362052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Most Published Criminological Research Findings Wrong? Taking Stock of Criminological Research Using a Bayesian Simulation Approach.
Niemeyer RE; Proctor KR; Schwartz JA; Niemeyer RG
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Nov; ():306624X221132997. PubMed ID: 36384305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology.
Yang Y; Hillebrand H; Lagisz M; Cleasby I; Nakagawa S
Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Feb; 28(3):969-989. PubMed ID: 34736291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple model suggesting economically rational sample-size choice drives irreproducibility.
Braganza O
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229615. PubMed ID: 32160229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
Smith RJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.
Karabatsos G
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 28985020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why most published research findings are false.
Ioannidis JP
PLoS Med; 2005 Aug; 2(8):e124. PubMed ID: 16060722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
Lin L
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
