136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 365388)
1. A controlled field trial of plain and aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed cholera vaccines in Surabaya, Indonesia, during 1973--75.
Saroso JS; Bahrawi W; Witjaksono H; Budiarso RL; Brotowasisto ; Bencić Z; Dewitt WE; Gomez CZ
Bull World Health Organ; 1978; 56(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 365388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A controlled field trial of an aluminum phosphate-adsorbed cholera vaccine in Calcutta.
Pal SC; Deb BC; Sen Gupta PG; De SP; Sircar BK; Sen D; Sikdar SN
Bull World Health Organ; 1980; 58(5):741-5. PubMed ID: 7028299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preparation and laboratory testing of plain and aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed cholera vaccines used in a field trial in Indonesia.
Joó I; Csizér Z
Bull World Health Organ; 1978; 56(4):615-8. PubMed ID: 310362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in Calcutta.
Das Gupta A; Sinha R; Shrivastava DL; De SP; Taneja BL; Rao MS; Abou-Gareeb AH
Bull World Health Organ; 1967; 37(3):371-85. PubMed ID: 5301381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines.
Azurin JC; Cruz A; Pesigan TP; Alvero M; Camena T; Suplido R; Ledesma L; Gomez CZ
Bull World Health Organ; 1967; 37(5):703-27. PubMed ID: 5300874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field trials of monovalent Ogawa and Inaba cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh--three years of observation.
Mosley WH; Aziz KM; Rahman AS; Chowdhury AK; Ahmed A
Bull World Health Organ; 1973; 49(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 4604478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A controlled field trial on the effectiveness of the intradermal and subcutaneous administration of cholera vaccine in the Philippines.
Philippines Cholera Committee
Bull World Health Organ; 1973; 49(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 4603994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Report of the 1966-67 cholera vaccine field trial in rural East Pakistan. I. Study design and results of the first year of observation.
Mosley WH; McCormack WM; Fahimuddin M; Aziz KM; Rahman AS; Chowdhury AK; Martin AR; Feeley JC; Phillips RA
Bull World Health Organ; 1969; 40(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 5306538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of monovalent classical and El Tor cholera vaccines in the Philippines.
Philippines Cholera Committee
Bull World Health Organ; 1973; 49(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 4596491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines. Preliminary report; Philippines Cholera Committee.
Philippines Cholera Committee
Bull World Health Organ; 1965; 32(5):603-25. PubMed ID: 5294176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antigenicity testing of plain and aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed whole-cell cholera vaccines.
Joó I
Acta Trop; 1979 Jun; 36(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 41423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cholera vaccine field trials in east Pakistan. 2. Effectiveness in the field.
Benenson AS; Mosley WH; Fahimuddin M; Oseasohn RO
Bull World Health Organ; 1968; 38(3):359-72. PubMed ID: 5302329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of various doses of cholera El Tor vaccine in the Philippines.
Philippines Cholera Committee
Bull World Health Organ; 1968; 38(6):917-23. PubMed ID: 5303665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cholera incidence in a population offered cholera vaccination: comparison of cooperative and uncooperative groups.
Azurin JC; Alvero M
Bull World Health Organ; 1971; 44(6):815-9. PubMed ID: 4950563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A serological survey for cholera antibodies in rural east Pakistan. 2. A comparison of antibody titres in the innunized and control populationd of a cholera-vaccine field-trial area and the relation of antibody titre to cholera case rate.
Mosley WH; Benenson AS; Barui R
Bull World Health Organ; 1968; 38(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 5302923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A review of the current status of enteric vaccines.
Levine MM; Noriega F
P N G Med J; 1995 Dec; 38(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 9522876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaccine Protection of Bangladeshi infants and young children against cholera: implications for vaccine deployment and person-to-person transmission.
Ali M; Emch M; Yunus M; Sack D; Lopez AL; Holmgren J; Clemens J
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2008 Jan; 27(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18162935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Report of the 1966-67 cholera vaccine trial in rural East Pakistan.
Mosley WH; Aziz KM; Mizanur Rahman AS; Alauddin Chowdhury AK; Ahmed A; Fahimuddin M
Bull World Health Organ; 1972; 47(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 4539414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of mass oral cholera vaccination in Beira, Mozambique.
Lucas ME; Deen JL; von Seidlein L; Wang XY; Ampuero J; Puri M; Ali M; Ansaruzzaman M; Amos J; Macuamule A; Cavailler P; Guerin PJ; Mahoudeau C; Kahozi-Sangwa P; Chaignat CL; Barreto A; Songane FF; Clemens JD
N Engl J Med; 2005 Feb; 352(8):757-67. PubMed ID: 15728808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse events after oral vaccination against cholera with CVD103-HgR.
Wiedermann G; Kollaritsch H; Jeschko E; Kundi M; Herzog C; Wegmüller B
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1998 May; 110(10):376-8. PubMed ID: 9654693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
