173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36539211)
1. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
Kojima M
Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
Noma H
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kyriakou S; Kosmidis I; Sartori N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1622-1636. PubMed ID: 29717942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals for the cumulative incidence function via constrained NPMLE.
Blanche P
Lifetime Data Anal; 2020 Jan; 26(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 30539364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Noma H; Hamura Y; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):731-741. PubMed ID: 37399845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the performance of model-based confidence intervals when the correct model form is unknown: coverage of asymptotic means.
Maldonado G; Greenland S
Epidemiology; 1994 Mar; 5(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 8172992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals of prediction accuracy measures for multivariable prediction models based on the bootstrap-based optimism correction methods.
Noma H; Shinozaki T; Iba K; Teramukai S; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5691-5701. PubMed ID: 34302372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bootstrap and second-order tests of risk difference.
Lloyd CJ
Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):975-82. PubMed ID: 19912176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the correction of the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic if nuisance parameters are estimated based on an external source.
Jonker M; Van der Vaart A
Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 24837490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion ratio based on correlated paired data.
Peng X; Liu C; Liu S; Ma CX
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1137-1152. PubMed ID: 30831053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient interval estimation of a ratio of marginal probabilities in matched-pair data: non-iterative method.
Nam JM
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2929-35. PubMed ID: 19691020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
