173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36539387)
1. Uncertainty quantification of reference-based cellular deconvolution algorithms.
Vellame DS; Shireby G; MacCalman A; Dempster EL; Burrage J; Gorrie-Stone T; Schalkwyk LS; Mill J; Hannon E
Epigenetics; 2023 Dec; 18(1):2137659. PubMed ID: 36539387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data.
Gervin K; Salas LA; Bakulski KM; van Zelm MC; Koestler DC; Wiencke JK; Duijts L; Moll HA; Kelsey KT; Kobor MS; Lyle R; Christensen BC; Felix JF; Jones MJ
Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Aug; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 31455416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the proportion of different cell types in the human cortex using DNA methylation profiles.
Hannon E; Dempster EL; Davies JP; Chioza B; Blake GET; Burrage J; Policicchio S; Franklin A; Walker EM; Bamford RA; Schalkwyk LC; Mill J
BMC Biol; 2024 Jan; 22(1):17. PubMed ID: 38273288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deconvolution of tumor composition using partially available DNA methylation data.
He D; Chen M; Wang W; Song C; Qin Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):355. PubMed ID: 36002797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.
Decamps C; Privé F; Bacher R; Jost D; Waguet A; ; Houseman EA; Lurie E; Lutsik P; Milosavljevic A; Scherer M; Blum MGB; Richard M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 31931698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic assessment of cell type deconvolution algorithms for DNA methylation data.
Song J; Kuan PF
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Nov; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36242584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference-free deconvolution, visualization and interpretation of complex DNA methylation data using DecompPipeline, MeDeCom and FactorViz.
Scherer M; Nazarov PV; Toth R; Sahay S; Kaoma T; Maurer V; Vedeneev N; Plass C; Lengauer T; Walter J; Lutsik P
Nat Protoc; 2020 Oct; 15(10):3240-3263. PubMed ID: 32978601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA methylation of cord blood cell types: Applications for mixed cell birth studies.
Bakulski KM; Feinberg JI; Andrews SV; Yang J; Brown S; L McKenney S; Witter F; Walston J; Feinberg AP; Fallin MD
Epigenetics; 2016 May; 11(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 27019159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic evaluation of DNA methylation age estimation with common preprocessing methods and the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array.
McEwen LM; Jones MJ; Lin DTS; Edgar RD; Husquin LT; MacIsaac JL; Ramadori KE; Morin AM; Rider CF; Carlsten C; Quintana-Murci L; Horvath S; Kobor MS
Clin Epigenetics; 2018 Oct; 10(1):123. PubMed ID: 30326963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cell-type deconvolution from DNA methylation: a review of recent applications.
Titus AJ; Gallimore RM; Salas LA; Christensen BC
Hum Mol Genet; 2017 Oct; 26(R2):R216-R224. PubMed ID: 28977446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell-Type Deconvolution of Bulk DNA Methylation Data with EpiSCORE.
Zhu T; Teschendorff AE
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2629():23-42. PubMed ID: 36929072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving cell mixture deconvolution by identifying optimal DNA methylation libraries (IDOL).
Koestler DC; Jones MJ; Usset J; Christensen BC; Butler RA; Kobor MS; Wiencke JK; Kelsey KT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():120. PubMed ID: 26956433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cell type-specific DNA methylation in neonatal cord tissue and cord blood: a 850K-reference panel and comparison of cell types.
Lin X; Tan JYL; Teh AL; Lim IY; Liew SJ; MacIsaac JL; Chong YS; Gluckman PD; Kobor MS; Cheong CY; Karnani N
Epigenetics; 2018; 13(9):941-958. PubMed ID: 30232931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA methylation patterns within whole blood of adolescents born from assisted reproductive technology are not different from adolescents born from natural conception.
Penova-Veselinovic B; Melton PE; Huang RC; Yovich JL; Burton P; Wijs LA; Hart RJ
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):2035-2049. PubMed ID: 33890633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different cell type correction methods for genome-scale epigenetics studies.
Kaushal A; Zhang H; Karmaus WJJ; Ray M; Torres MA; Smith AK; Wang SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):216. PubMed ID: 28410574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational deconvolution of DNA methylation data from mixed DNA samples.
Ferro Dos Santos MR; Giuili E; De Koker A; Everaert C; De Preter K
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38762790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects.
Houseman EA; Kile ML; Christiani DC; Ince TA; Kelsey KT; Marsit CJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17():259. PubMed ID: 27358049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of reference-based algorithms for correcting cell-type heterogeneity in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.
Teschendorff AE; Breeze CE; Zheng SC; Beck S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 28193155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. imply: improving cell-type deconvolution accuracy using personalized reference profiles.
Meng G; Pan Y; Tang W; Zhang L; Cui Y; Schumacher FR; Wang M; Wang R; He S; Krischer J; Li Q; Feng H
Genome Med; 2024 Apr; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 38685057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saliva cell type DNA methylation reference panel for epidemiological studies in children.
Middleton LYM; Dou J; Fisher J; Heiss JA; Nguyen VK; Just AC; Faul J; Ware EB; Mitchell C; Colacino JA; M Bakulski K
Epigenetics; 2022; 17(2):161-177. PubMed ID: 33588693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
