78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36540003)
1. Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive.
Prylińska-Czyżewska A; Maciejewska-Szaniec Z; Olszewska A; Polichnowska M; Grabarek BO; Dudek D; Sobański D; Czajka-Jakubowska A
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Dec; 28():e938867. PubMed ID: 36540003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with five different adhesive systems: in vitro study.
Masarykova N; Tkadlec E; Chlup Z; Vrbsky J; Brysova A; Cernochova P; Izakovicova Holla L
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):637. PubMed ID: 37670283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with primer-incorporated orthodontic adhesives and unpolymerized 3-dimensional printing materials on 3-dimensional-printed crowns.
Choi Y; Moon W; Manso AP; Park YS; Lim BS; Chung SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jun; 165(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 38520414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of residual monomer amounts released from indirect bonding adhesives.
Hezenci Y; Akdeniz BS
Angle Orthod; 2023 Sep; 93(5):558-565. PubMed ID: 37212680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of mechanical properties, remineralization, antibacterial effect, and cellular toxicity of composite orthodontic adhesive combined with silver-containing nanostructured bioactive glass.
Seifi M; Eskandarloo F; Amdjadi P; Farmany A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):650. PubMed ID: 38824555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Formulation of arginine-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Arg@MSNs) modified orthodontic adhesive.
An J; Shen X; Peng T; Qiao M; Xu B
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104992. PubMed ID: 38599563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bracket bond strength to etched and unetched enamel under dry and wet conditions using Fuji Ortho LC glass-ionomer.
Feizbakhsh M; Aslani F; Gharizadeh N; Heidarizadeh M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 28413593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.
Boudrot M; François P; Abdel-Gawad S; Attal JP; Dantagnan CA
BDJ Open; 2024 Jan; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 38167700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of strontium fluoride on mechanical and remineralization properties of enamel: An in-vitro study on a modified orthodontic adhesive.
Saxena K; Ann CM; Azwar MABM; Banavar SR; Matinlinna J; Peters OA; Daood U
Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):811-823. PubMed ID: 38490919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical effects of graphene addition on adhesives for orthodontic lingual retainers.
Liu S; El-Angbawi A; Ji R; Rosa V; Silikas N
Eur J Oral Sci; 2024 Feb; 132(1):e12966. PubMed ID: 38062539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonded lingual retainer adhesives and discoloration : An in vitro study.
Yazıcıoğlu S; Karadeniz H
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Oct; 84(Suppl 3):259-265. PubMed ID: 36867217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence enables effective detection of orthodontic adhesive residues in diverse environments.
Wu C; Mangal U; Kim J; Lee KJ; Cha JY; Kwon JS; Choi SH
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103743. PubMed ID: 37567330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Conventional and Laser Etching on the Bonding of the Orthodontic Brackets: An Original Research.
Gupta E; Gurrala C; Chaugule TA; Abdul Qadeer S; Padmapriya CV; Sharma M
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S183-S185. PubMed ID: 38595481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Research progress in the performance of clear aligner attachment materials].
Cao LY; Yan JR; Hua F; He H
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 59(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 38172070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial.
Pellitteri F; Cremonini F; Bellavia M; Palone M; Lombardo L
Saudi Dent J; 2023 Sep; 35(6):657-662. PubMed ID: 37823083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a novel fixed-space maintainer made of light-cured acrylic resin: an in vitro study.
Souror YR; Maaly T; Khawandanah MS
BDJ Open; 2020; 6():17. PubMed ID: 33042577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry.
Park EY; Kang S
Yeungnam Univ J Med; 2020 Jul; 37(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 32668523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of lingual retainer wires bonded with three different lingual retainer composites: an in vitro study.
Nimbalkar-Patil S; Vaz A; Patil PG
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC83-7. PubMed ID: 25584325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preparation and performance evaluation of a novel orthodontic adhesive incorporating composite dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate-Polycaprolactone fibers.
Xu X; Yuan Q; Xu L; Hu M; Xu J; Wang Y; Song Y
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304143. PubMed ID: 38781281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of an easy-to-remove orthodontic adhesive with photochromic property.
Yan J; Cao L; Luo T; Hua F; He H
Angle Orthod; 2024 Mar; 94(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 38052230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
