These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36540429)
1. Comparison Between Mini-Sternotomy and Full Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Faraz A; Fundano N; Qureshi AI; Tarar MY; Yawar B; Mohammed GDF Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31627. PubMed ID: 36540429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ministernotomy or sternotomy in isolated aortic valve replacement? Early results. Filip G; Bryndza MA; Konstanty-Kalandyk J; Piatek J; Wegrzyn P; Ceranowicz P; Brzezinski M; Lakkireddy D; Kapelak B; Bartuś K Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2018 Dec; 15(4):213-218. PubMed ID: 30647743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy. Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? Xie XB; Dai XF; Qiu ZH; Jiang DB; Wu QS; Dong Y; Chen LW J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 35922828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience. Neely RC; Boskovski MT; Gosev I; Kaneko T; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn LH Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 4(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 25694975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study. Paparella D; Malvindi PG; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; Fattouch K; Margari V; Martinelli L; Albertini A; Speziale G Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effects of minimally invasive approaches vs. conventional for obese patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Abdelaal SA; Abdelrahim NA; Mamdouh M; Ahmed N; Ahmed TR; Hefnawy MT; Alaqori LK; Abozaid M BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 Aug; 23(1):392. PubMed ID: 37559011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper 'J' ministernotomy versus full sternotomy: an easier approach for aortic valve reoperation. Mikus E; Calvi S; Tripodi A; Lamarra M; Del Giglio M J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24151754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy). Aliahmed HMA; Karalius R; Valaika A; Grebelis A; Semėnienė P; Čypienė R Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Apr; 54(2):. PubMed ID: 30344257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-Sternotomy Versus Conventional Sternotomy In Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery; A Comparative Study. Bakr Ali MK; Abdelaal MM; Elfeky WM; Abdou Ettish AA J Pak Med Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(Suppl 4)(4):S56-S60. PubMed ID: 37482831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? Cuenca J; Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA; Valle JV; Campos V; Herrera JM; Rodriguez F; Portela F; Sorribas F; Juffe A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 9814804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal access median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in elderly patients. Alassar Y; Yildirim Y; Pecha S; Detter C; Deuse T; Reichenspurner H J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 8():103. PubMed ID: 23601376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid-Deployment Versus Conventional Bio-Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement. Smith AL; Shi WY; Rosalion A; Yii M; O'Keefe M; Newcomb AE; Davis P Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27523460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of ministernotomy in aortic valve surgery-A prospective randomized study. Vukovic PM; Milojevic P; Stojanovic I; Micovic S; Zivkovic I; Peric M; Milicic M; Milacic P; Milojevic M; Bojic M J Card Surg; 2019 Jun; 34(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 31017315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach. Hassan M; Miao Y; Maraey A; Lincoln J; Brown S; Windsor J; Ricci M J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 26897831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]