113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36541210)
1. One bite or two? A comparison of single bite and double bite
Muhammad H; Burch N; Gordon V; Umar S; Jankowski J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 58(6):680-683. PubMed ID: 36541210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of standard single-bite with multiple-bite biopsy forceps for collection of gastrointestinal biopsies in dogs: a prospective study.
Edery EG; Scase T; Kisielewicz C; Dhumeaux MP
Vet Rec; 2018 Nov; 183(20):624. PubMed ID: 30115670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic biopsy technique in the diagnosis of celiac disease: one bite or two?
Latorre M; Lagana SM; Freedberg DE; Lewis SK; Lebwohl B; Bhagat G; Green PH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1228-33. PubMed ID: 25638509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-bite versus double-bite technique for mapping biopsies during endoscopic surveillance for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a single-center, randomized trial.
Pappas A; Tan WK; Waldock W; Richardson S; Tripathi M; Januszewicz W; Roberts G; O'Donovan M; Fitzgerald RC; di Pietro M
Endoscopy; 2021 Mar; 53(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 32679601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions.
Ji JS; Lee BI; Choi KY; Kim BW; Choi H; Huh M; Chung WC; Chae HS; Chung IS
Korean J Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 24(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19543487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection.
Cantor MJ; Davila RE; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jul; 64(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 16813799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Routine jejunal endoscopic biopsy in children.
Vukavić T; Vucković N; Pavkov D
Eur J Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 155(12):1002-4. PubMed ID: 8956932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided deep and large biopsy for diagnosis of gastric infiltrating tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies.
Zhou XX; Pan HH; Usman A; Ji F; Jin X; Zhong WX; Chen HT
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 21(12):3607-13. PubMed ID: 25834327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bite-on-bite biopsies for the detection of residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
van der Bogt RD; van der Wilk BJ; Oudijk L; Schoon EJ; van Lijnschoten G; Corporaal S; Nieken J; Siersema PD; Bisseling TM; van der Post RS; Quispel R; van Tilburg A; Oostenbrug LE; Riedl RG; Hol L; Kliffen M; Nikkessen S; Eyck BM; van Lanschot JJB; Doukas M; Spaander MCW
Endoscopy; 2022 Dec; 54(12):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 35668664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vascular malformation simulating a gastric subepithelial lesion: The risks of the bite-on-bite biopsy technique.
Candia R; Arenas Aravena A; Chahuán J; Riquelme C; Méndez G
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):277-278. PubMed ID: 36205316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Bite Count Feedback from a Wearable Device and Goal Setting on Consumption in Young Adults.
Jasper PW; James MT; Hoover AW; Muth ER
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Nov; 116(11):1785-1793. PubMed ID: 27346460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histological quality of polyps resected using the cold versus hot biopsy technique.
Mönkemüller KE; Fry LC; Jones BH; Wells C; Mikolaenko I; Eloubeidi M
Endoscopy; 2004 May; 36(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 15100953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tunneled biopsy is an underutilised, simple, safe and efficient method for tissue acquisition from subepithelial tumours.
Koutsoumpas A; Perera R; Melton A; Kuker J; Ghosh T; Braden B
World J Clin Cases; 2021 Jul; 9(21):5822-5829. PubMed ID: 34368301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of endoscopic and capsule small intestinal biopsy techniques in children with upper gastrointestinal disorders.
Eltumi MA; Ong PS; Francis ND; Brueton MJ
J Paediatr Child Health; 1996 Jun; 32(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 8827546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Site specific diagnostic yield of endoscopic biopsies in Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease: A tertiary care Center experience.
Daniel F; Hassoun L; Husni M; Sharara A; Soweid A; Barada K; Haffar B; Massoud R; Shaib Y; Al-Hashash J; Bazarbachi A; El Cheikh J
Curr Res Transl Med; 2019 Feb; 67(1):16-19. PubMed ID: 30206046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are endoscopic biopsies of small bowel as good as suction biopsies for diagnosis of enteropathy?
Thomson M; Kitching P; Jones A; Walker-Smith JA; Phillips A
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1999 Oct; 29(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 10512404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One bite or two? A prospective trial comparing colonoscopy biopsy technique in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.
Hookey LC; Hurlbut DJ; Day AG; Manley PN; Depew WT
Can J Gastroenterol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 17377645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
