These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36541467)
1. The automated measurement of CT number linearity using an ACR accreditation phantom. Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Budi WS; Maya AT; Dougherty G Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36541467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of commercial extension plates for the ACR CT accreditation phantom. Greene-Donnelly KA; Ogden KM J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):416-420. PubMed ID: 26894348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of CT parameters on the physical quantities related to image quality for two MDCT scanners using the ACR accreditation phantom: A phantom study. Alikhani B; Jamali L; Raatschen HJ; Wacker F; Werncke T Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 28687287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Algorithm development for automatic laser alignment assessment on an ACR CT phantom and its evaluation on sixteen CT scanners. Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Dougherty G Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Oct; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37788647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Channelized hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study. Fan M; Zhou Z; McCollough C; Yu L Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1714-1725. PubMed ID: 38305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom. Cropp RJ; Seslija P; Tso D; Thakur Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4417. PubMed ID: 24257284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms. Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Sutanto H; Dwihapsari Y; Fujibuchi T; Dougherty G J Biomed Phys Eng; 2023 Aug; 13(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 37609515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of MR stereotactic imaging and image co-registration accuracy for 3 different MR scanners by 3 different methods/phantoms: phantom and patient study. Paštyková V; Novotný J; Veselský T; Urgošík D; Liščák R; Vymazal J J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30544292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners. Das M; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Gietema HA; Czech A; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Katoh M; Bakai A; Salganicoff M; Diederich S; Prokop M; Kauczor HU; Günther RW; Wildberger JE Eur Radiol; 2007 Aug; 17(8):1979-84. PubMed ID: 17206420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom. Friedman SN; Fung GS; Siewerdsen JH; Tsui BM Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051907. PubMed ID: 23635277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QAMaster: A new software framework for phantom-based computed tomography quality assurance. Karius A; Bert C J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13588. PubMed ID: 35297569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners. Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Cheebsumon P; Pengpan T J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 27977415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom. Song SE; Seo BK; Yie A; Ku BK; Kim HY; Cho KR; Chung HH; Lee SH; Hwang KW Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(6):776-83. PubMed ID: 23118577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of failed CT phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT accreditation program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image. Park HJ; Jung SE; Lee YJ; Cho WI; Do KH; Kim SH; Na DG Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 18682674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators. Rezaee M; Letourneau D J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31176438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated development of the contrast-detail curve based on statistical low-contrast detectability in CT images. Anam C; Naufal A; Fujibuchi T; Matsubara K; Dougherty G J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13719. PubMed ID: 35808971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of three vendor's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging using a customized phantom. Chou R; Li JH; Ying LK; Lin CH; Leung W Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Oct; 24(sup2):34-42. PubMed ID: 31502481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phantom study for the comparison of different brands of computed tomography scanners and software packages for endovascular aneurysm repair sizing and planning. Velu JF; Groot Jebbink E; de Vries JP; van der Palen JA; Slump CH; Geelkerken RH Vascular; 2018 Apr; 26(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 28820356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]