These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36541467)

  • 21. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of x-ray tube stabilization on localized radiation dose in axial CT scans: initial results in CTDI phantoms.
    Mathieu KB; McNitt-Gray MF; Cody DD
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7363-7376. PubMed ID: 27694696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
    Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracies of the synthesized monochromatic CT numbers and effective atomic numbers obtained with a rapid kVp switching dual energy CT scanner.
    Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson SC
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2222-32. PubMed ID: 21626956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a computational phantom for validation of automated noise measurement in CT images.
    Anam C; Sutanto H; Adi K; Budi WS; Muhlisin Z; Haryanto F; Matsubara K; Fujibuchi T; Dougherty G
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 35135906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
    Miura H; Ozawa S; Okazue T; Kawakubo A; Yamada K; Nagata Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models.
    Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.
    Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
    McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers.
    Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fully automated quantification method (FQM) of coronary calcium in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    van Praagh GD; van der Werf NR; Wang J; van Ommen F; Poelhekken K; Slart RHJA; Fleischmann D; Greuter MJW; Leiner T; Willemink MJ
    Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3730-3740. PubMed ID: 33932026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On replacing the manual measurement of ACR phantom images performed by MRI technologists with an automated measurement approach.
    Panych LP; Chiou JY; Qin L; Kimbrell VL; Bussolari L; Mulkern RV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 26395366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of automatic tube current modulation of CT scanners using a dedicated and the CTDI dosimetry phantoms.
    Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; AlNaemi H; Kharita MH
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13620. PubMed ID: 35678780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical Note: Development and validation of an open data format for CT projection data.
    Chen B; Duan X; Yu Z; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough C
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6964-72. PubMed ID: 26632052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated Quantitative Analysis of American College of Radiology PET Phantom Images.
    DiFilippo FP; Patel M; Patel S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Sep; 47(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 31019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.