138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36541506)
21. Impact of Data-driven Respiratory Gating in Clinical PET.
Büther F; Vehren T; Schäfers KP; Schäfers M
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):229-38. PubMed ID: 27092660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effects of CT-based Attenuation Correction on PET Images Using Data-driven Respiratory Gating].
Yamashita K; Miyaji N; Motegi K; Ito S; Terauchi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(11):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 34803112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative comparison of data-driven gating and external hardware gating for
Kvernby S; Hult NK; Lindström E; Sigfridsson J; Linder G; Hedberg J; Ahlström H; Bjerner T; Lubberink M
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2021 Mar; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 34181124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of patient's habitus on image quality and quantitative metrics in 18F-FDG PET/CT images.
Zorz A; D'Alessio A; Guida F; Ramadan RM; Richetta E; Cuppari L; Pellerito R; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Paiusco M; Stasi M; Matheoud R
Phys Med; 2023 May; 109():102584. PubMed ID: 37060633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical evaluation of data-driven respiratory gating for PET/CT in an oncological cohort of 149 patients: impact on image quality and patient management.
Messerli M; Liberini V; Grünig H; Maurer A; Skawran S; Lohaus N; Husmann L; Orita E; Trinckauf J; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
Br J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 94(1126):20201350. PubMed ID: 34520673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
Lu S; Zhang P; Li C; Sun J; Liu W; Zhang P
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34749660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: A lung phantom study.
Pevsner A; Nehmeh SA; Humm JL; Mageras GS; Erdi YE
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7Part1):2358-2362. PubMed ID: 28493572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: a lung phantom study.
Pevsner A; Nehmeh SA; Humm JL; Mageras GS; Erdi YE
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2358-62. PubMed ID: 16121593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New Data-Driven Gated PET/CT Free of Misregistration Artifacts.
Pan T; Lu Y; Thomas MA; Liao Z; Luo D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Apr; 109(5):1638-1646. PubMed ID: 33186619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of a shorter variable-acquisition time for legs to achieve true whole-body PET/CT images.
Umeda T; Miwa K; Murata T; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Motegi K; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 40(4):861-868. PubMed ID: 29098601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Motion Management in PET/CT: Technological Solutions.
De Ponti E; Morzenti S; Crivellaro C; Elisei F; Crespi A; Guerra L
Curr Radiopharm; 2018; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 29676240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion.
Vines DC; Keller H; Hoisak JD; Breen SL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 18006594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance.
Oddstig J; Leide Svegborn S; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hedeer F; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Jönsson L; Minarik D; Petersson R; Welinder A; Wollmer P; Trägårdh E
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Oct; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 31640584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
