225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3654170)
1. Multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: a contribution to diagnosis and classification.
Cosi V; Citterio A; Battelli G; Bergamaschi R; Grampa G; Callieco R
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():109-12. PubMed ID: 3654170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Visual, early auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis (917 cases)].
Fischer C; Mauguière F; Ibañez V; Courjon J
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1986; 142(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 3787054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of multimodal evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
Reisecker F; Hubatschek W; Steinhäusl H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jun; 98(12):379-85. PubMed ID: 3739354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multimodal evoked potentials and CSF findings in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Morocutti C; Pozzessere G; Valle E; Mollica MA; Quadrini R; Sanarelli L; Rizzo PA; Amabile G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 3672010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Hamilton-Bruce MA; Black AB; Chappell DJ; Pannall PR
Clin Exp Neurol; 1989; 26():89-97. PubMed ID: 2642142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Kjaer M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 39():291-6. PubMed ID: 3477437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials].
Cui L
Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Jun; 25(3):130-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1395937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Papathanasiou ES; Pantzaris M; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Kyriakides T; Kleopa KA; Iliopoulos I; Piperidou C; Papacostas S
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 15378872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The combined use of instrumental and laboratory examinations in multiple sclerosis: is the diagnostic facilitation real?].
Paolino E; Granieri E; Tola MR; Govoni V; Casetta I; Monetti VC; Carreras M
Riv Neurol; 1990; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 2247751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other instrumental examinations.
Rumbach L; Collard M; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Armspach JP; Gounot D; Chambron J
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():125-8. PubMed ID: 3654174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evoked response study among Malaysian multiple sclerosis patients.
Tan CT; Leong S
Singapore Med J; 1992 Dec; 33(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 1488664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of evoked potentials to the diagnosis of demyelinating diseases.
Colon EJ
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():97-102. PubMed ID: 3654184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the relation to VEP, SEP and CSF immunoglobulins.
Sand T; Sjaastad O; Romslo I; Sulg I
J Neurol; 1990 Oct; 237(6):376-8. PubMed ID: 2277273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The correlation between cerebrospinal fluid findings and evoked potentials during an acute MS attack.
Irkeç C; Nazliel B; Koçer B
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Mar; 41(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 11284055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Central motor conduction time in multiple sclerosis: an comparison of visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in relation to the type of disease course].
Witt TN; Garner CG; Oechsner M
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1988 Dec; 19(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 2850153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and electrophysiological characteristics of the earliest multiple sclerosis.
Rot U; Ledinek AH; Jazbec SS
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2008 Mar; 110(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18093725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
