These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36543444)
21. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial. Song L; Tu S; Sun Z; Wang Y; Ding D; Guan C; Xie L; Escaned J; Fearon WF; Kirtane AJ; Serruys PW; Wijns W; Windecker S; Leon MB; Stone GW; Qiao S; Xu B; Am Heart J; 2020 May; 223():72-80. PubMed ID: 32179258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study. Biscaglia S; Tebaldi M; Brugaletta S; Cerrato E; Erriquez A; Passarini G; Ielasi A; Spitaleri G; Di Girolamo D; Mezzapelle G; Geraci S; Manfrini M; Pavasini R; Barbato E; Campo G JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2079-2088. PubMed ID: 31563688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. Mejía-Rentería H; Nombela-Franco L; Paradis JM; Lunardi M; Lee JM; Amat-Santos IJ; Veiga Fernandez G; Kalra A; Bansal EJ; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Rodés-Cabau J; Ribichini FL; Escaned J; EuroIntervention; 2020 Jul; 16(4):e285-e292. PubMed ID: 32207408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study. Chang Y; Chen L; Westra J; Sun Z; Guan C; Zhang Y; Ding D; Xu B; Tu S Cardiol J; 2020; 27(3):230-237. PubMed ID: 30234896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. Xu B; Tu S; Qiao S; Qu X; Chen Y; Yang J; Guo L; Sun Z; Li Z; Tian F; Fang W; Chen J; Li W; Guan C; Holm NR; Wijns W; Hu S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 29101020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization). Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Kelbæk H; Helqvist S; Kløvgaard L; Holmvang L; Pedersen F; Jørgensen E; Saunamäki K; Clemmensen P; De Backer O; Ravkilde J; Tilsted HH; Villadsen AB; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Raungaard B; Køber L; Høfsten DE; Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 28404623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Dai N; Yuan S; Dou K; Zhang R; Hu N; He J; Guan C; Zou T; Qiao Z; Duan S; Xie L; Yu Y; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ge J J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Jun; 11(11):e024903. PubMed ID: 35656982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Sejr-Hansen M; Christiansen EH; Ahmad Y; Vendrik J; Westra J; Holm NR; Thim T; Seligman H; Hall K; Sen S; Terkelsen CJ; Eftekhari A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 33533535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Based Functional SYNTAX Score in Patients With Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Zhang R; Song C; Guan C; Liu Q; Wang C; Xie L; Sun Z; Cai M; Zhang M; Wang H; Liu J; Dou K; Xu B Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009155. PubMed ID: 33040580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation. Li Z; Zhan J; Han J; Fu G; Jin C Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2022 Feb; 23(2):59. PubMed ID: 35229550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study. Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Xu B; Tu S; Song L; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Zhou Y; Wang J; Chen Y; Pu J; Chen L; Qu X; Yang J; Liu X; Guo L; Shen C; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Pan H; Fu X; Liu J; Zhao Y; Escaned J; Wang Y; Fearon WF; Dou K; Kirtane AJ; Wu Y; Serruys PW; Yang W; Wijns W; Guan C; Leon MB; Qiao S; Stone GW; Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2149-2159. PubMed ID: 34742368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality. Zhang R; Xu B; Dou K; Guan C; Zhao Y; Wang X; Zou T; Qiao Z; Xie L; Wang H; Yuan S; Song L; Tu S; Wang Y; Wijns W Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():33-39. PubMed ID: 35101540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-invasive imaging software to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Duarte A; Llewellyn A; Walker R; Schmitt L; Wright K; Walker S; Rothery C; Simmonds M Health Technol Assess; 2021 Sep; 25(56):1-230. PubMed ID: 34588097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of Invasive Functional Assessment in Surgical Revascularization of Coronary Artery Disease. Baibhav B; Gedela M; Moulton M; Pavlides G; Pompili V; Rab T; Dangas G; Bhatt DL; Siddique A; Chatzizisis YS Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(16):1731-1739. PubMed ID: 29661951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Feasible and Accurate Even at Lower Frame Acquisition Rate. Milzi A; Dettori R; Lubberich RK; Reith S; Burgmaier K; Marx N; Burgmaier M Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Dec; 16(12):e013266. PubMed ID: 37846560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [ Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Fournier S; Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Johnson NP; Ciccarelli G; Xaplanteris P; Milkas A; Strisciuglio T; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Casselman F; Van Praet F; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Barbato E Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e006368. PubMed ID: 29848611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]