These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36543725)

  • 21. Institutional Micro-Cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs Single-use Cystoscopes With Assessment of Environmental Footprint.
    Bertolo R; Gilioli V; Veccia A; Malandra S; Dal Corso L; Fenzi D; Mazzetto F; Antonelli A
    Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():70-76. PubMed ID: 38499187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
    Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
    Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.
    Kim J; Gao B; Bhojani N; Zorn KC; Chughtai B; Elterman DS
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Oct; 16(10):346-350. PubMed ID: 35621291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Clinical Use and Cost-Effectiveness of a Flexible Cystoscope System with a Disposable Sheath: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zambon JP; Watkins TP; Hemal A; Evans RJ; Gutierrez-Aceves J; Mirzazadeh M; Terlecki RP; Deveshwar SP; Hemal K; Badlani GH
    Urol Pract; 2019 Jul; 6(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 37317475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula.
    Donahue LM; Hilton S; Bell SG; Williams BC; Keoleian GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):225.e1-225.e7. PubMed ID: 32067971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the environmental impact of reusable and disposable dental examination kits: a life cycle assessment approach.
    Byrne D; Saget S; Davidson A; Haneef H; Abdeldaim T; Almudahkah A; Basquille N; Bergin AM; Prida J; Lyne A; Duane B
    Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 36028697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of practice efficiency with a novel sheathed flexible cystoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
    Krebs A; Borin JF; Kim IY; Jackson DJ; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 17919698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Post-cystoscopy infections and device malfunctions in reprocessed flexible cystoscopes in a national database.
    Lee J; Kaplan-Marans E; Jivanji D; Tennenbaum D; Schulman A
    Can J Urol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):11361-11365. PubMed ID: 36495577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Disposable Cystoscopes Do Not Decrease Post Renal Transplant Stent Removal Symptomatic Infection Rates.
    Qosja N; Geldmaker LE; Tiwari V; Fuqua TR; Baird BA; Haehn DA; Ball CT; Wadei HM; Thiel DD
    Urology; 2024 Oct; 192():1-4. PubMed ID: 38908562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Microbiological evaluation of cystoscope reprocessing at Brest university hospital from January 2007 through December 2014].
    Saliou P; Le Bars H; Fournier G; Baron R
    Prog Urol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 26638802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A microbiological evaluation of level of disinfection for flexible cystoscopes protected by disposable endosheaths.
    Jørgensen PH; Slotsbjerg T; Westh H; Buitenhuis V; Hermann GG
    BMC Urol; 2013 Oct; 13():46. PubMed ID: 24099332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Durability of flexible cystoscopes in the outpatient setting.
    McGill JJ; Schaeffer AJ; Gonzalez CM
    Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):932-7. PubMed ID: 23490525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental impact of single-use versus reusable gastroscopes.
    Pioche M; Pohl H; Cunha Neves JA; Laporte A; Mochet M; Rivory J; Grau R; Jacques J; Grinberg D; Boube M; Baddeley R; Cottinet PJ; Schaefer M; Rodríguez de Santiago E; Berger A;
    Gut; 2024 Oct; 73(11):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 39122363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outbreak of cystoscopy related infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: New Mexico, 2007.
    Wendelboe AM; Baumbach J; Blossom DB; Frank P; Srinivasan A; Sewell CM
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):588-92; discussion 592. PubMed ID: 18554660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1465. PubMed ID: 35620912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    van Straten B; Ligtelijn S; Droog L; Putman E; Dankelman J; Weiland NHS; Horeman T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17680. PubMed ID: 34480045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better".
    Rizan C; Bhutta MF
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1466-1467. PubMed ID: 35848502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.