These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36543725)
41. Does reusable mean green? Comparison of the environmental impact of reusable operating room bed covers and lift sheets versus single-use. Chang JH; Woo KP; Silva de Souza Lima Cano N; Bilec MM; Camhi M; Melnyk AI; Gross A; Walsh RM; Asfaw SH; Gordon IO; Miller BT Surgeon; 2024 Aug; 22(4):236-241. PubMed ID: 38862376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Out-patient flexible cystoscopy using a disposable slide-on endosheath system. Kimuli M; Lloyd SN Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):426-30. PubMed ID: 17535625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Perspectives on technology: to use or to reuse, that is the endoscopic question-a systematic review of single-use endoscopes. Anderson S; Patterson K; Skolarikos A; Somani B; Bolton DM; Davis NF BJU Int; 2024 Jan; 133(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 37838621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cleanroom Coveralls. Vozzola E; Overcash M; Griffing E PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):236-248. PubMed ID: 29444994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Economic and organizational impact of the use of a disposable sheath with a flexible cystoscope]. Coste AC; Ruffion A; Lechevallier E; Devonec M; Paparel P; Champetier D; Vinet M; Adam E; Briant PE; De Vendin C; Coulange C; Delaporte V; Gaillet S; Faïs PO; Monges A; Arnoux V; Armoiry X; Gardes S; Bin S; Karsenty G Prog Urol; 2013 Apr; 23(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 23545011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The planetary health effects of COVID-19 in dental care: a life cycle assessment approach. Almutairi W; Saget S; Mc Donnell J; Tarnowski A; Johnstone M; Duane B Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 36028696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Environmental footprints of disposable and reusable personal protective equipment ‒ a product life cycle approach for body coveralls. Snigdha ; Hiloidhari M; Bandyopadhyay S J Clean Prod; 2023 Mar; 394():136166. PubMed ID: 36721728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes. Gilling PJ; Reuther RM; Addidle M; Lockhart MM; Frampton CM; Fraundorfer MR BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():69-73. PubMed ID: 24127679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Reprocessing cystoscopes in urology. Guideline compliance in hospitals and private practices in Frankfurt/M, Germany in 2005/2006]. Heudorf U; Otto U Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1138-44. PubMed ID: 17828476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Flexible cystoscopes: disinfection and microbiological surveillance practices among French urologists]. Malavaud S; Boiteux JP; Coloby P; Bugel H; Verine JL; Conquy S; Doublet JD; Bruyère F Prog Urol; 2012 Oct; 22(12):731-5. PubMed ID: 22999121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation. Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The flexible cystoscope. Pavone-Macaluso M; Lamartina M; Pavone C; Vella M Int Urol Nephrol; 1992; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 1399380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of resolution, contrast, and color differentiation among fiberoptic and digital flexible cystoscopes. Borin JF; Abdelshehid CS; Clayman RV J Endourol; 2006 Jan; 20(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 16426134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Editorial Comment on "Institutional Micro-cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs Single-use Cystoscopes With Assessment of Environmental Footprint". Zampini AM Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():77. PubMed ID: 38648948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Reply to Editorial Comment on "Institutional Micro-Cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs. Single-Use Cystoscopes with assessment of environmental footprint". Bertolo R; Veccia A; Antonelli A Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():78-79. PubMed ID: 38719114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal. Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Prioritized utilisation and reprocessing of reusable equipment in anaesthesiology deparmtents : Recommendations on how to reduce CO Richter H; Schulz-Stübner S; Pecher S; Orlowski S; Coburn M; Schuster M Anaesthesiologie; 2023 Jun; 72(6):433-444. PubMed ID: 36930267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Influence of systematic antibiotic prophylaxis and/or cystoscope cleaning/disinfecting method on urinary culture becoming positive after outpatient flexible cystoscopy.]. Martínez Rodríguez R; Felip E; Arzoz Fabregas M; Ruiz Domínguez J; Ibarz Servio L Arch Esp Urol; 2019 Jul; 72(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 31274119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comment on 'environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes'. Baboudjian M; Bastide C; Lechevallier E BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):634. PubMed ID: 36820507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]