These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3654389)

  • 1. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.
    Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Probst R; Scheinin SA; Coats AC
    Hear Res; 1987; 28(2-3):191-208. PubMed ID: 3654389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Probst R; Coats AC
    Hear Res; 1987; 28(2-3):173-89. PubMed ID: 3654388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions].
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Aug; 100(8):839-45. PubMed ID: 9293764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones.
    Furst M; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 3411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man.
    Brown AM; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 6706860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1-f2.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3268-74. PubMed ID: 8914309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane.
    He W; Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 17353104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An intracochlear DP-gram: Proof of principle in noise-damaged rabbits.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Dong W; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 396():108058. PubMed ID: 32871416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.