BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36544396)

  • 1. Cost comparison of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim biosimilars for inpatient prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.
    Singer K; Forshay CM; Kennerly-Shah J
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(7):1695-1701. PubMed ID: 36544396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
    McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
    J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
    Blackwell K; Donskih R; Jones CM; Nixon A; Vidal MJ; Nakov R; Singh P; Schaffar G; Gascón P; Harbeck N
    Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27091420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim biosimilars vs originator for prevention of febrile neutropenia: A retrospective cohort study.
    Wang CY; Vouri SM; Park H; Heldermon CD; Brown JD
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 36705287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.
    Leung M; Florendo J; Kano J; Marr-Del Monte T; Higgins B; Myers R; Menon T; Jones G
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jun; 23(6):1669-77. PubMed ID: 25421443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany.
    Hadji P; Kostev K; Schröder-Bernhardi D; Ziller V
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Apr; 50(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 22456299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient out-of-pocket and payer costs for pegfilgrastim originator vs biosimilars as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle among a commercially insured population.
    Wang CY; Park H; Heldermon CD; Vouri SM; Brown JD
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2022 Jul; 28(7):795-802. PubMed ID: 35737859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
    Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
    Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors.
    Lambertini M; Ferreira AR; Del Mastro L; Danesi R; Pronzato P
    Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2015; 15(12):1799-817. PubMed ID: 26488491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.