These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36544601)

  • 1. The role of nursing members in research ethics committees in Japan.
    Sakaida Y; Ota K; Sone C
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2022 Nov; 84(4):813-824. PubMed ID: 36544601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical concerns in suicide research: thematic analysis of the views of human research ethics committees in Australia.
    Barnard E; Dempster G; Krysinska K; Reifels L; Robinson J; Pirkis J; Andriessen K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33827554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.
    Burgess T; Rennie S; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 36793067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of ethical review committees in Japan: examining the certification applications of ethical review committees.
    Iijima Y; Ogasawara K; Toda S; Takano T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 81(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 31579340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members.
    Hokke S; Hackworth NJ; Bennetts SK; Nicholson JM; Keyzer P; Lucke J; Zion L; Crawford SB
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020; 15(1-2):12-27. PubMed ID: 31195884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nurses serving on clinical ethics committees: a qualitative exploration of a competency profile.
    Cusveller B
    Nurs Ethics; 2012 May; 19(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 22323396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.
    Osborne LW
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics committees for "high tech" innovations in Japan.
    Kimura R
    J Med Philos; 1989 Aug; 14(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 2778417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information-sharing ethical dilemmas and decision-making for public health nurses in Japan.
    Suzuki C; Ota K; Matsuda M
    Nurs Ethics; 2015 Aug; 22(5):533-47. PubMed ID: 25316458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inconsistencies in institutional review board decisions: A proposal to regulate the decision-making process.
    Ekmekci PE; Guner MD
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2019; 120(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 30793611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenges of hospital ethics committees: a phenomenological study.
    Raoofi S; Arefi S; Khodayari Zarnaq R; Azimi Nayebi B; Mousavi MSS
    J Med Ethics Hist Med; 2021; 14():26. PubMed ID: 35600213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.
    Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 24938695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
    Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes to research ethical committees.
    Allen P; Waters WE
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 6876098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives of non-specialists on the potential to serve as ethics committee members.
    Kane C; Takechi K; Chuma M; Nokihara H; Takagai T; Yanagawa H
    J Int Med Res; 2019 May; 47(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 30678503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human research ethics committees members: ethical review personal perceptions.
    Handal B; Campbell C; Watson K; Maher M; Brewer K; Irwin AM; Fellman M
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2021 Jul; 39(1):94-114. PubMed ID: 34170483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurses performance in clinical ethics committees and commissions: An integrative review.
    de Brito GMG; de Oliveira Santa Rosa D
    Nurs Ethics; 2019 May; 26(3):688-699. PubMed ID: 28933257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.