These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36545515)

  • 1. The Concerns and Experiences of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Regarding Prehabilitation and Recovery After Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Study.
    Lam AKH; Fung OHY; Kwan C; Cheung JPY; Luk KDK; Chiu AYY; Descarreaux M; Szeto GPY; Wong AYL
    Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl; 2022 Dec; 4(4):100227. PubMed ID: 36545515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study.
    Eubanks JE; Cupler ZA; Gliedt JA; Bejarano G; Skolasky RL; Smeets RJEM; Schneider MJ
    PM R; 2024 Sep; 16(9):992-1000. PubMed ID: 38578142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' experience with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a qualitative study.
    Bove AM; Lynch AD; Ammendolia C; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 28870836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Qualitative Study of Preparation for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: Perceptions of Patients and Physical Therapists.
    McCarthy AE; Bove AM; Piva S; Mecca LP; Schneider MJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Apr; 50(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 31663813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis seek education and care focused on self-management-results of focus groups among participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial.
    Lynch AD; Bove AM; Ammendolia C; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Aug; 18(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29246847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the PREPARE (PREhabilitation, Physical Activity and exeRcisE) program to improve outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery for severe low back pain: a study protocol of a person-centred randomised controlled trial.
    Lotzke H; Jakobsson M; Brisby H; Gutke A; Hägg O; Smeets R; den Hollander M; Olsson LE; Lundberg M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Aug; 17(1):349. PubMed ID: 27538757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of an exercise-based prehabilitation program for patients awaiting surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marchand AA; Houle M; O'Shaughnessy J; Châtillon CÉ; Cantin V; Descarreaux M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11080. PubMed ID: 34040109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How people with lumbar spinal stenosis make decisions about treatment: A qualitative study using the Health Belief Model.
    Peterson S; Mesa A; Halpert B; Bordenave L
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2021 Aug; 54():102383. PubMed ID: 33965775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative Factors Predict Postoperative Trajectories of Pain and Disability Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Hébert JJ; Abraham E; Wedderkopp N; Bigney E; Richardson E; Darling M; Hall H; Fisher CG; Rampersaud YR; Thomas KC; Jacobs WB; Johnson M; Paquet J; Attabib N; Jarzem P; Wai EK; Rasoulinejad P; Ahn H; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Manson N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1421-E1430. PubMed ID: 32541610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of prehabilitation or preoperative exercise for surgical patients: a systematic review.
    Cabilan CJ; Hines S; Munday J
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):146-87. PubMed ID: 26447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a prehabilitation program on patients' recovery following spinal stenosis surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Marchand AA; Suitner M; O'Shaughnessy J; Châtillon CÉ; Cantin V; Descarreaux M
    Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():483. PubMed ID: 26507388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.
    Gillis C; Gill M; Gramlich L; Culos-Reed SN; Nelson G; Ljungqvist O; Carli F; Fenton T
    Can J Surg; 2021; 64(6):E578-E587. PubMed ID: 34728523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences of patients enrolled and staff involved in the prehabilitation of elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery trial: a nested qualitative study.
    Harrison SL; Loughran KJ; Trevis J; Witharana P; Maier R; Hancock H; Bardgett M; Mathias A; Akowuah EF
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Oct; 78(10):1215-1224. PubMed ID: 37402349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical Predictors of Favorable Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laminectomy or Laminotomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Marchand AA; Houle M; O'Shaughnessy J; Châtillon CÉ; Descarreaux M
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():848665. PubMed ID: 35493839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of Prehabilitation Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Brahmbhatt P; Sabiston CM; Lopez C; Chang E; Goodman J; Jones J; McCready D; Randall I; Rotstein S; Santa Mina D
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():571091. PubMed ID: 33072603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective measurement of function following lumbar spinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional capacity with stagnant real-life physical activity.
    Smuck M; Muaremi A; Zheng P; Norden J; Sinha A; Hu R; Tomkins-Lane C
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28962914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptability of prehabilitation for cancer surgery: a multi-perspective qualitative investigation of patient and 'clinician' experiences.
    Powell R; Davies A; Rowlinson-Groves K; French DP; Moore J; Merchant Z
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Aug; 23(1):744. PubMed ID: 37568097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the experiences, thoughts, and feelings underlying and influencing prehabilitation among cancer patients: a qualitative perspective on the what, when, where, who, and why.
    Beck A; Thaysen HV; Soegaard CH; Blaakaer J; Seibaek L
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 44(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 32400218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing activities and participation in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: The Cochin Spinal Stenosis 19-item questionnaire.
    Masi C; Couraud G; Daste C; Jouffriault J; Poiraudeau S; LefÈvre-Colau MM; Rannou F; Nguyen C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Feb; 57(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 33111510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.