These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36546939)

  • 1. Comparative Analysis of the Self-Propelled Locomotion of a Pitching Airfoil near the Flat and Wavy Ground.
    Xin Z; Cai Z; Ren Y; Liu H
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 36546939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow Control around the UAS-S45 Pitching Airfoil Using a Dynamically Morphing Leading Edge (DMLE): A Numerical Study.
    Bashir M; Zonzini N; Botez RM; Ceruti A; Wong T
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36810382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameter study of simplified dragonfly airfoil geometry at Reynolds number of 6000.
    Levy DE; Seifert A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 20673771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance of a heaving airfoil using synthetic-jet based active flow control.
    Wang C; Tang H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 May; 13(4):046005. PubMed ID: 29648545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical Simulation of the Transient Flow around the Combined Morphing Leading-Edge and Trailing-Edge Airfoil.
    Bashir M; Negahban MH; Botez RM; Wong T
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2024 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 38392154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An experimental study of trailing edge noise from a pitching airfoil.
    Zhou T; Sun Y; Fattah R; Zhang X; Huang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2009. PubMed ID: 31046340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vortex scale of unsteady separation on a pitching airfoil.
    Fuchiwaki M; Tanaka K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 Oct; 972():61-6. PubMed ID: 12495998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations.
    Golmirzaee N; Wood DH
    Adv Aerodyn; 2024; 6(1):7. PubMed ID: 38464493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multifidelity kinematic parameter optimization of a flapping airfoil.
    Zheng H; Xie F; Ji T; Zhu Z; Zheng Y
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jan; 101(1-1):013107. PubMed ID: 32069665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propulsion performance of a two-dimensional flapping airfoil with wake map and dynamic mode decomposition analysis.
    Zheng H; Xie F; Zheng Y; Ji T; Zhu Z
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Jun; 99(6-1):063109. PubMed ID: 31330751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert-inspired flaps for lift enhancement and stall mitigation.
    Duan C; Wissa A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Jun; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 33784648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly wing section in gliding flight.
    Vargas A; Mittal R; Dong H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2008 Jun; 3(2):026004. PubMed ID: 18503106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow visualization over a thick blunt trailing-edge airfoil with base cavity at low Reynolds numbers using PIV technique.
    Taherian G; Nili-Ahmadabadi M; Karimi MH; Tavakoli MR
    J Vis (Tokyo); 2017; 20(4):695-710. PubMed ID: 29026342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active control of airfoil turbulent boundary layer noise with trailing-edge blowing.
    Yang C; Arcondoulis EJG; Yang Y; Guo J; Maryami R; Bi C; Liu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2115. PubMed ID: 37092929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Starting Flow Past an Airfoil and its Acquired Lift in a Superfluid.
    Musser S; Proment D; Onorato M; Irvine WTM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Oct; 123(15):154502. PubMed ID: 31702294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic efficiency of bio-inspired corrugated and cambered airfoils in ground effect.
    Abdizadeh GR; Farokhinejad M; Ghasemloo S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19117. PubMed ID: 36351992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Mound Versus Flat-Ground Pitching and Distance on Arm Mechanics and Elbow Torque in High School Pitchers.
    Dowling B; McElheny KD; Camp CL; Ling DI; Dines JS
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 8(12):2325967120969245. PubMed ID: 33354584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical comparison of pitching from a mound versus flat ground in adolescent baseball pitchers.
    Nissen CW; Solomito M; Garibay E; Ounpuu S; Westwell M
    Sports Health; 2013 Nov; 5(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 24427428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rolling and pitching oscillating foil propulsion in ground effect.
    Perkins M; Elles D; Badlissi G; Mivehchi A; Dahl J; Licht S
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Nov; 13(1):016003. PubMed ID: 28869422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Basis of Interval Throwing Programs for Baseball Pitchers: A Systematic Review.
    Dias T; Lerch BG; Slowik JS; Wilk KE; Andrews JR; Cain EL; Fleisig GS
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2023; 18(5):1036-1053. PubMed ID: 37795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.