These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36547819)

  • 1. Evidence from partially valid cueing that words are processed serially.
    Johnson M; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1539-1548. PubMed ID: 36547819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
    Lai G; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.
    Stolz JA; McCann RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1320-31. PubMed ID: 10946717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic Priming from Uncued Distractors in Alzheimer's Disease.
    Higgins JA; Milberg W; McGlinchey R
    Exp Aging Res; 2024; 50(4):401-421. PubMed ID: 37087755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.
    Mayo JP; Maunsell JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(19):5353-61. PubMed ID: 27170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic and spatial components of selective attention.
    Dark VJ; Vochatzer KG; Van Voorhis BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Feb; 22(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 8742252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.
    Talipski LA; Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1845-1857. PubMed ID: 34811633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Does a Cue Do? Comparing Phonological and Semantic Cues for Picture Naming in Aphasia.
    Meteyard L; Bose A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):658-674. PubMed ID: 29486495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: evidence from an event-related potentials study.
    Zhang M; Zhang Y
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 17314669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task cue influences on lexical decision performance and masked semantic priming effects: The role of cue-task compatibility.
    Berger A; Kunde W; Kiefer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2684-2701. PubMed ID: 36127490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects.
    Chen L; Zhu P; Li J; Song H; Liu H; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105488. PubMed ID: 37178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.
    Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of display-to-display feature changes on net cueing effects: Evidence for a contribution of object-file updating.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):908-919. PubMed ID: 31931666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():965. PubMed ID: 25237306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing allocation of visual attention with emotional cues presented in two sensory modalities.
    Zimmer U; Wendt M; Pacharra M
    Behav Brain Funct; 2022 Sep; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 36138461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.