These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36548056)
1. Modeling face similarity in police lineups. Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology. Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance. McKinley GL; Peterson DJ Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Oct; 7(1):95. PubMed ID: 36271974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task. Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification. Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects. Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups. Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance. McKinley GL; Peterson DJ Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Nov; 8(1):68. PubMed ID: 37930437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification. Shen KJ; Huang J; Lam AL; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups. Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]