These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36548061)
1. A dual-task approach to inform the taxonomy of inhibition-related processes. Bissett PG; Jones HM; Hagen MP; Bui TT; Li JK; Rios JAH; Mumford JA; Shine JM; Poldrack RA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Mar; 49(3):277-289. PubMed ID: 36548061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching. Segal D; Stasenko A; Gollan TH J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):501-519. PubMed ID: 30394767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting? Hilt PM; Cardellicchio P Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 29520490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensional bias and adaptive adjustments in inhibitory control of monkeys. Ghasemian S; Vardanjani MM; Sheibani V; Mansouri FA Anim Cogn; 2021 Jul; 24(4):815-828. PubMed ID: 33554317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BOLD differences normally attributed to inhibitory control predict symptoms, not task-directed inhibitory control in ADHD. Chevrier A; Schachar RJ J Neurodev Disord; 2020 Feb; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 32085698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of state anxiety on performance using a task-switching paradigm: an investigation of attentional control theory. Derakshan N; Smyth S; Eysenck MW Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1112-7. PubMed ID: 19966264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of different Stop-signal response time estimation procedures on behavior-behavior and brain-behavior correlations. Boehler CN; Appelbaum LG; Krebs RM; Hopf JM; Woldorff MG Behav Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 229(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 22245527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obsessive compulsive disorder and response inhibition: Meta-analysis of the stop-signal task. Mar K; Townes P; Pechlivanoglou P; Arnold P; Schachar R J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 Feb; 131(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 34968087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Working Memory Load Selectively Influences Response Inhibition in a Stop Signal Task. Boucher L; Viparina B; Collins WM Psychol Rep; 2021 Jun; 124(3):1268-1281. PubMed ID: 32515276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task. Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in mixing costs relate to general executive functioning. Smith LL; Banich MT; Friedman NP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 29985039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Bissett PG; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 21171806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Catecholaminergic effects on inhibitory control depend on the interplay of prior task experience and working memory demands. Bensmann W; Zink N; Roessner V; Stock AK; Beste C J Psychopharmacol; 2019 Jun; 33(6):678-687. PubMed ID: 30816793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference and attentional switching in aging. Schumann CA; Evans NJ; Robinson GA Neuropsychology; 2024 Jan; 38(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 37384445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconsidering electrophysiological markers of response inhibition in light of trigger failures in the stop-signal task. Skippen P; Fulham WR; Michie PT; Matzke D; Heathcote A; Karayanidis F Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13619. PubMed ID: 32725926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Working memory and behavioral inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an examination of varied central executive demands, construct overlap, and task impurity. Tarle SJ; Alderson RM; Patros CHG; Arrington EF; Roberts DK Child Neuropsychol; 2019 Jul; 25(5):664-687. PubMed ID: 30226410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in inhibitory motor control. Krämer UM; Solbakk AK; Funderud I; Løvstad M; Endestad T; Knight RT Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):837-49. PubMed ID: 22699024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of normal aging and Parkinson's disease on response preparation in task-switching behavior. Witt K; Daniels C; Schmitt-Eliassen J; Kernbichler J; Rehm S; Volkmann J; Deuschl G Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 16920086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impaired conscious and preserved unconscious inhibitory processing in recent onset schizophrenia. Huddy VC; Aron AR; Harrison M; Barnes TR; Robbins TW; Joyce EM Psychol Med; 2009 Jun; 39(6):907-16. PubMed ID: 18796175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time. Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]