These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36548980)

  • 1. Evaluating the Differences Between Fluorescein Tear Break-up Time and Noninvasive Measurement Techniques.
    Itokawa T; Suzuki T; Koh S; Hori Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2023 Mar; 49(3):104-109. PubMed ID: 36548980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Methods of Tear Film Stability Assessment: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Wang MTM; Craig JP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 136(3):291-294. PubMed ID: 29392287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the first tear film break-up point in Sjögren's syndrome and non-Sjögren's syndrome dry eye patients.
    Zhao S; Le Q
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):1. PubMed ID: 34980014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Multimodal evaluation of the ocular surface using a the new Lacrydiag device].
    Remongin PE; Rousseau A; Best AL; Ben Hadj Salah W; Legrand M; Benichou J; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Mar; 44(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 33583607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging the Tear Film: A Comparison Between the Subjective Keeler Tearscope-Plus™ and the Objective Oculus® Keratograph 5M and LipiView® Interferometer.
    Markoulli M; Duong TB; Lin M; Papas E
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Feb; 43(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 29135324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Each Eye According to the Order of Noninvasive Keratographic Tear Film Evaluation.
    Shin H; Jung S; Jung JW
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):230-235. PubMed ID: 37309556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Location and pattern of non-invasive keratographic tear film break-up according to dry eye disease subtypes.
    Kim J; Kim JY; Seo KY; Kim TI; Chin HS; Jung JW
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1089-e1097. PubMed ID: 31062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of tear film and meibomian gland function in dry eye patients using Keratograph 5M].
    Zhu K; Xie W; Ying J; Yao Y
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 May; 45(4):422-428. PubMed ID: 27868417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive Imaging of Tear Film Dynamics in Eyes With Ocular Surface Disease.
    Abdelfattah NS; Dastiridou A; Sadda SR; Lee OL
    Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34 Suppl 10():S48-52. PubMed ID: 26226477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-Invasive Tear Break-Up Detection with the Kowa DR-1α and Its Relationship to Dry Eye Clinical Severity.
    Pflugfelder S; Nakhleh L; Kikukawa Y; Tanaka S; Kosugi T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 36499103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive assessment of tear film stability with a novel corneal topographer in Indian subjects.
    Bhandari V; Reddy JK; Relekar K; Ingawale A; Shah N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 36(6):781-790. PubMed ID: 26887564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison and Evaluation of Prelens Tear Film Stability by Different Noninvasive in vivo Methods.
    Itokawa T; Suzuki T; Iwashita H; Hori Y
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4459-4468. PubMed ID: 33376300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manual interferometric device for routine non-invasive tear film break-up time assessment.
    Pauk SV; Petriček I; Tomić M; Bulum T; Jandroković S; Kalauz M; Masnec S; Jukić T
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 36(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 33641610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tear Film Surface Quality in Modern Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wear.
    Mousavi M; Garaszczuk IK; De Jesus DA; Szczesna-Iskander DH; Armstrong RA; Nichols KK; Iskander DR
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Dec; 47(12):631-637. PubMed ID: 34797270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of tear film stability in dry eye with a newly developed keratograph.
    Hong J; Sun X; Wei A; Cui X; Li Y; Qian T; Wang W; Xu J
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):716-21. PubMed ID: 23132457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement and repeatability of four different devices to measure non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT).
    Bandlitz S; Peter B; Pflugi T; Jaeger K; Anwar A; Bikhu P; Nosch DS; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Oct; 43(5):507-511. PubMed ID: 32143961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Tear Film Surface Quality Breakup Time as a Novel Clinical Marker for Tear Hyperosmolarity in Dry Eye Disease.
    Downie LE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7260-8. PubMed ID: 26544794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraobserver Repeatability Assessment of the S390L Firefly WDR Slitlamp in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: Objective, Automated, and Noninvasive Measures.
    Ballesteros-Sánchez A; Gargallo-Martínez B; Gutiérrez-Ortega R; Sánchez-González JM
    Eye Contact Lens; 2023 Jul; 49(7):283-291. PubMed ID: 37171516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional Differences in Tear Film Stability and Meibomian Glands in Patients With Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye.
    Koh S; Ikeda C; Fujimoto H; Oie Y; Soma T; Maeda N; Nishida K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Jul; 42(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 26383772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes.
    Molina-Martín A; de Fez D; Piñero DP
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 40(11):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 32772219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.