143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36549970)
21. Different Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Li Z; Gao Y; Gong H; Feng W; Ma Q; Li J; Lu X; Wang X; Lei J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 May; 57(5):1392-1403. PubMed ID: 36054564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Role of Preoperative Imaging in the Detection of Lateral Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Meta-analysis.
Rooney S; Meyer J; Afzal Z; Ashcroft J; Cheow H; De Paepe KN; Powar M; Simillis C; Wheeler J; Davies J; Joshi H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Dec; 65(12):1436-1446. PubMed ID: 36102825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy with dedicated axillary hybrid
de Mooij CM; Samiei S; Mitea C; Lobbes MBI; Kooreman LFS; Heuts EM; Beets-Tan RGH; van Nijnatten TJA; Smidt ML
Clin Radiol; 2022 Oct; 77(10):e732-e740. PubMed ID: 35850866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Meta-analysis of the performance of (18)F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma.
Jiménez-Requena F; Delgado-Bolton RC; Fernández-Pérez C; Gambhir SS; Schwimmer J; Pérez-Vázquez JM; Carreras-Delgado JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Feb; 37(2):284-300. PubMed ID: 19727717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Cooper KL; Meng Y; Harnan S; Ward SE; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D; Wyld L; Ingram C; Wilkinson ID; Lorenz E
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. PubMed ID: 21276372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases may be limited.
Zhang X; Wu F; Han P
Hell J Nucl Med; 2014; 17(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25526754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Role of PET/MR in Breast Cancer?
Bruckmann NM; Morawitz J; Fendler WP; Ruckhäberle E; Bittner AK; Giesel FL; Herrmann K; Antoch G; Umutlu L; Kirchner J
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 Sep; 52(5):611-618. PubMed ID: 35260243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Local and whole-body staging in patients with primary breast cancer: a comparison of one-step to two-step staging utilizing
Kirchner J; Grueneisen J; Martin O; Oehmigen M; Quick HH; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Ingenwerth M; Catalano OA; Heusch P; Buchbender C; Forsting M; Antoch G; Herrmann K; Umutlu L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Dec; 45(13):2328-2337. PubMed ID: 30056547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for suspected primary and postoperative pyogenic spondylitis.
Zhang Q; Feng H; Li J; Feng R
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 36627651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ren Q; Chen Y; Shao X; Guo L; Xu X
Eur J Med Res; 2023 May; 28(1):162. PubMed ID: 37143144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Liu T; Cheng T; Xu W; Yan WL; Liu J; Yang HL
Skeletal Radiol; 2011 May; 40(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 20495798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Senthil R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 22334135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography versus conventional imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases.
Shao M; Zi J; Wen G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 14(Supplement):S661-S666. PubMed ID: 30249884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
An YS; Lee DH; Yoon JK; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Kang DK; Kim KS; Jung YS; Yim H
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 24220324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A meta-analysis of ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT, ¹⁸FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.
Qu X; Huang X; Yan W; Wu L; Dai K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1007-15. PubMed ID: 21354739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PET/CT in breast cancer staging is useful for evaluation of axillary lymph node and distant metastases.
Davidson T; Shehade N; Nissan E; Sklair-Levy M; Ben-Haim S; Barshack I; Zippel D; Halevy A; Chikman B
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101567. PubMed ID: 33866190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
