137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36549991)
1. Microwave Breast Lesion Classification - Results from Clinical Investigation of the SAFE Microwave Breast Cancer System.
Janjic A; Akduman I; Cayoren M; Bugdayci O; Aribal ME
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S1-S8. PubMed ID: 36549991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gradient-Boosting Algorithm for Microwave Breast Lesion Classification-SAFE Clinical Investigation.
Janjic A; Akduman I; Cayoren M; Bugdayci O; Aribal ME
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36553158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation-Free Microwave Technology for Breast Lesion Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning Model.
Rana SP; Dey M; Loretoni R; Duranti M; Ghavami M; Dudley S; Tiberi G
Tomography; 2023 Jan; 9(1):105-129. PubMed ID: 36648997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microwave Imaging in Breast Cancer - Results from the First-In-Human Clinical Investigation of the Wavelia System.
Moloney BM; McAnena PF; Abd Elwahab SM; Fasoula A; Duchesne L; Gil Cano JD; Glynn C; O'Connell A; Ennis R; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S211-S222. PubMed ID: 34364762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Lesion Detection in Microwave Breast Imaging Clinical Data.
Rana SP; Dey M; Tiberi G; Sani L; Vispa A; Raspa G; Duranti M; Ghavami M; Dudley S
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10510. PubMed ID: 31324863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.
Ruvio G; Solimene R; Cuccaro A; Fiaschetti G; Fagan AJ; Cournane S; Cooke J; Ammann MJ; Tobon J; Browne JE
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy].
Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J
Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated BI-RADS classification of lesions using pyramid triple deep feature generator technique on breast ultrasound images.
Kaplan E; Chan WY; Dogan S; Barua PD; Bulut HT; Tuncer T; Cizik M; Tan RS; Acharya UR
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Oct; 108():103895. PubMed ID: 36195364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
Gu Y; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang C; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu J; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jun; 22(4):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 34815174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.
Janu E; Krikavova L; Little J; Dvorak K; Brancikova D; Jandakova E; Pavlik T; Kovalcikova P; Kazda T; Valek V
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32552678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast pathology and mammography BI-RADS category correlation study - A single institute experience.
Hu S; Szymanski J; Khairy Z; Lo Y; Wang Y
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 35():11-15. PubMed ID: 30072013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
