414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36550398)
1. Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.
Honvoh GD; Cho H; Kosorok MR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):328. PubMed ID: 36550398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The net benefit for time-to-event outcome in oncology clinical trials with treatment switching.
Fukuda M; Sakamaki K; Oba K
Clin Trials; 2023 Dec; 20(6):670-680. PubMed ID: 37455538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Doubly Robust Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment with Censored Data.
Zhao YQ; Zeng D; Laber EB; Song R; Yuan M; Kosorok MR
Biometrika; 2015 Mar; 102(1):151-168. PubMed ID: 25937641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data.
Cui Y; Zhu R; Kosorok M
Electron J Stat; 2017; 11(2):3927-3953. PubMed ID: 29403568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):69. PubMed ID: 30935369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.
Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Hu C
Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2768-80. PubMed ID: 25999295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubly robust estimator of risk in the presence of censoring dependent on time-varying covariates: application to a primary prevention trial for coronary events with pravastatin.
Kawahara T; Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):204. PubMed ID: 32736528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.
Díaz I; Colantuoni E; Hanley DF; Rosenblum M
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):439-468. PubMed ID: 29492746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring.
Chakladar S; Rosin S; Hudgens MG; Halloran ME; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):777-788. PubMed ID: 33768557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast approximations of pseudo-observations in the context of right censoring and interval censoring.
Bouaziz O
Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2200071. PubMed ID: 36843309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation in optimal treatment regimes based on mean residual lifetimes with right-censored data.
Liu Z; Zhan Z; Lin C; Zhang B
Biom J; 2023 Dec; 65(8):e2200340. PubMed ID: 37789592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regression with a right-censored predictor using inverse probability weighting methods.
Matsouaka RA; Atem FD
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):4001-4015. PubMed ID: 32779274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable selection using inverse probability of censoring weighting.
Kojima M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2184-2206. PubMed ID: 37675496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric estimation of marked survival data in the presence of dependent censoring.
Sanusi B; Cai J; Hudgens MG
Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(12):1995-2008. PubMed ID: 36945185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right-censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
Yu Y; Zhang M; Mukherjee B
Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3699-3715. PubMed ID: 37392070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time.
Hanada K; Moriya J; Kojima M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Mar; 138():107440. PubMed ID: 38228232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cox regression with survival-time-dependent missing covariate values.
Yi Y; Ye T; Yu M; Shao J
Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):460-471. PubMed ID: 31549744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating optimal individualized treatment rules with multistate processes.
Bakoyannis G
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2830-2842. PubMed ID: 37015010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
