These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36550398)

  • 1. Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.
    Honvoh GD; Cho H; Kosorok MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):328. PubMed ID: 36550398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The net benefit for time-to-event outcome in oncology clinical trials with treatment switching.
    Fukuda M; Sakamaki K; Oba K
    Clin Trials; 2023 Dec; 20(6):670-680. PubMed ID: 37455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doubly Robust Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment with Censored Data.
    Zhao YQ; Zeng D; Laber EB; Song R; Yuan M; Kosorok MR
    Biometrika; 2015 Mar; 102(1):151-168. PubMed ID: 25937641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data.
    Cui Y; Zhu R; Kosorok M
    Electron J Stat; 2017; 11(2):3927-3953. PubMed ID: 29403568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.
    Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):69. PubMed ID: 30935369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
    Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
    Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Hu C
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2768-80. PubMed ID: 25999295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doubly robust estimator of risk in the presence of censoring dependent on time-varying covariates: application to a primary prevention trial for coronary events with pravastatin.
    Kawahara T; Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):204. PubMed ID: 32736528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.
    Díaz I; Colantuoni E; Hanley DF; Rosenblum M
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):439-468. PubMed ID: 29492746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring.
    Chakladar S; Rosin S; Hudgens MG; Halloran ME; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):777-788. PubMed ID: 33768557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast approximations of pseudo-observations in the context of right censoring and interval censoring.
    Bouaziz O
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2200071. PubMed ID: 36843309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation in optimal treatment regimes based on mean residual lifetimes with right-censored data.
    Liu Z; Zhan Z; Lin C; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2023 Dec; 65(8):e2200340. PubMed ID: 37789592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression with a right-censored predictor using inverse probability weighting methods.
    Matsouaka RA; Atem FD
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):4001-4015. PubMed ID: 32779274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable selection using inverse probability of censoring weighting.
    Kojima M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2184-2206. PubMed ID: 37675496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric estimation of marked survival data in the presence of dependent censoring.
    Sanusi B; Cai J; Hudgens MG
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(12):1995-2008. PubMed ID: 36945185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right-censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
    Yu Y; Zhang M; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3699-3715. PubMed ID: 37392070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time.
    Hanada K; Moriya J; Kojima M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Mar; 138():107440. PubMed ID: 38228232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cox regression with survival-time-dependent missing covariate values.
    Yi Y; Ye T; Yu M; Shao J
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):460-471. PubMed ID: 31549744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating optimal individualized treatment rules with multistate processes.
    Bakoyannis G
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2830-2842. PubMed ID: 37015010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.