These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How researchers can make verbal lie detection more attractive for practitioners. Vrij A; Fisher RP; Leal S Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(3):383-396. PubMed ID: 37346059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview. Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event. Bogaard G; Meijer EH; Vrij A; Merckelbach H Front Psychol; 2016; 7():243. PubMed ID: 26941694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposing immersive virtual reality scenarios for validating verbal content analysis methods in adult samples. Iffland JA; Volz T; Gubi-Kelm S Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1352091. PubMed ID: 38440246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component. Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Sleepy Joe' and 'Donald, King of Whoppers': Reality Monitoring and Verbal Deception in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election Debates. Bond GD; Speller LF; Cockrell LL; Webb KG; Sievers JL Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3090-3103. PubMed ID: 35634896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How Information on a Motive to Lie Influences CBCA-Based Ratings and Veracity Judgments. Schemmel J; Steinhagen T; Ziegler M; Volbert R Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2021. PubMed ID: 32922341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verbal Deception and the Model Statement as a Lie Detection Tool. Vrij A; Leal S; Fisher RP Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():492. PubMed ID: 30356902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Science of Lie Detection by Verbal Cues: What Are the Prospects for Its Practical Applicability? Brennen T; Magnussen S Front Psychol; 2022; 13():835285. PubMed ID: 35478762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly? Sporer SL; Masip J Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1219995. PubMed ID: 37771816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the verifiability approach to deception detection in alibi witness situations. Vernham Z; Vrij A; Nahari G; Leal S; Mann S; Satchell L; Orthey R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103020. PubMed ID: 32014621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool. Nahari G; Vrij A; Fisher RP Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 22471387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception. Bogaard G; Meijer EH; Vrij A; Merckelbach H PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156615. PubMed ID: 27258014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digging Further Into the Speech of Liars: Future Research Prospects in Verbal Lie Detection. Nahari G; Nisin Z Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():56. PubMed ID: 30858807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting deception in children: an experimental study of the effect of event familiarity on CBCA ratings. Blandon-Gitlin I; Pezdek K; Rogers M; Brodie L Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15912723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects. Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample? Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]