199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36553914)
1. Examination of the Public's Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans.
Mane H; Yue X; Yu W; Doig AC; Wei H; Delcid N; Harris AG; Nguyen TT; Nguyen QC
Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36553914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.
Swanson K; Ravi A; Saleh S; Weia B; Pleasants E; Arvisais-Anhalt S
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46655. PubMed ID: 37171873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court
Ujah OI; Olaore P; Nnorom OC; Ogbu CE; Kirby RS
Front Glob Womens Health; 2023; 4():1149441. PubMed ID: 37214560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.
Berg JA; Woods NF
Womens Midlife Health; 2023 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36609311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives on Privacy in the Post-Roe Era: A Mixed-Methods of Machine Learning and Qualitative Analyses of Tweets.
Guo Y; Zehrung R; Genuario K; Lu X; Mei Q; Chen Y; Zheng K
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2023; 2023():951-960. PubMed ID: 38222378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The overturn of Roe v. Wade beyond abortion: a snapshot of methotrexate accessibility for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases-a mixed methods study using Twitter data.
Negrón JB; Rodriguez-Malavé MJ; Camacho CO; Malavé CL; Rodríguez-Guzmán VM
Rheumatol Int; 2023 Dec; 43(12):2293-2301. PubMed ID: 37572172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.
Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Interest in Permanent Contraception Peaked Following the Leaked Supreme Court Majority Opinion of Roe vs. Wade: A Cross-Sectional Google Trends Analysis.
Ghomeshi A; Diaz P; Henry V; Ramasamy R; Masterson TA
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30582. PubMed ID: 36420253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geographic Differences in Cannabis Conversations on Twitter: Infodemiology Study.
van Draanen J; Tao H; Gupta S; Liu S
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Oct; 6(4):e18540. PubMed ID: 33016888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
Kaplan L
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
