These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36555892)

  • 1. In-Hospital Mortality and Risk Prediction in Minimally Invasive Sutureless versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Santarpino G; Lorusso R; Peivandi AD; Atzeni F; Avolio M; Dell'Aquila AM; Speziale G
    J Clin Med; 2022 Dec; 11(24):. PubMed ID: 36555892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique.
    Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial between conventional versus sutureless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: Impact of mini and full sternotomy access at 1-year follow-up.
    Fischlein T; Caporali E; Folliguet T; Kappert U; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; Bonaros N; Fabre O; Corbi P; Troise G; Andreas M; Pinaud F; Pfeiffer S; Kueri S; Tan E; Voisine P; Girdauskas E; Rega F; García-Puente J; Lorusso R
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 368():56-61. PubMed ID: 35944771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.
    Mujtaba SS; Ledingham SM; Shah AR; Pillay T; Schueler S; Clark S
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 33(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29898140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Jessl J; Dell'Aquila AM; Pollari F; Pauschinger M; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):561-7. PubMed ID: 24280712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sutureless versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
    Santarpino G; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Dell'Aquila AM; Jessl J; Cuomo F; von Wardenburg C; Fischlein T; Pauschinger M; Schwab J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 29092108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
    Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: short-term efficacy of sutureless compared with stented bioprostheses.
    Paparella D; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; De Santis A; Fattouch K; Martinelli L; Coppola R; Mikus E; Albertini A; Del Giglio M; Gregorini R; Speziale G
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2021 Jul; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33984125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment valves: a report from an international registry (Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry)†.
    Berretta P; Andreas M; Carrel TP; Solinas M; Teoh K; Fischlein T; Santarpino G; Folliguet T; Villa E; Meuris B; Mignosa C; Martinelli G; Misfeld M; Glauber M; Kappert U; Savini C; Shrestha M; Phan K; Albertini A; Yan T; Di Eusanio M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Oct; 56(4):793-799. PubMed ID: 30820549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.
    Lorusso R; Folliguet T; Shrestha M; Meuris B; Kappetein AP; Roselli E; Klersy C; Nozza M; Verhees L; Larracas C; Goisis G; Fischlein T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 68(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 30497085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sutureless Valve Implantation via Mini J-Sternotomy: A Single Center Experience with 2 Years Mean Follow-up.
    Fischlein T; Pfeiffer S; Pollari F; Sirch J; Vogt F; Santarpino G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 26177222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results.
    Cresce GD; Sella M; Hinna Danesi T; Favaro A; Salvador L
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Autumn; 32(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 31972301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Fischlein T; Folliguet T; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; McGlothlin A; Kappert U; Pfeiffer S; Corbi P; Lorusso R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 161(3):920-932. PubMed ID: 33478837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic Performance of Sutureless vs. Conventional Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The 1-Year Core-Lab Results of the Randomized PERSIST-AVR Trial.
    Fischlein T; Caporali E; Asch FM; Vogt F; Pollari F; Folliguet T; Kappert U; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; Bonaros N; Fabre O; Corbi P; Troise G; Andreas M; Pinaud F; Pfeiffer S; Kueri S; Tan E; Voisine P; Girdauskas E; Rega F; García-Puente J; De Kerchove L; Lorusso R
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():844876. PubMed ID: 35252408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Sutureless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Guner Y; Çiçek A; Karacalilar M; Ersoy B; Kyaruzi M; Onan B
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 May; 37(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 34236798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter to the Editor: Thrombocytopenia After Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation: Does It Really Matter?
    Santarpino G; Vogt F
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Jul; 26(4):492. PubMed ID: 29302952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.
    Woldendorp K; Doyle MP; Bannon PG; Misfeld M; Yan TD; Santarpino G; Berretta P; Di Eusanio M; Meuris B; Cerillo AG; Stefàno P; Marchionni N; Olive JK; Nguyen TC; Solinas M; Bianchi G
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Sep; 9(5):347-363. PubMed ID: 33102174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.