169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36556709)
21. New surface-hardened, low-modulus, corrosion-resistant Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy for total hip arthroplasty.
Davidson JA; Mishra AK; Kovacs P; Poggie RA
Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 7950871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bactericidal activity of the Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy against different species of bacteria related with implant infection.
Aguilera-Correa JJ; Conde A; Arenas MA; de-Damborenea JJ; Marin M; Doadrio AL; Esteban J
Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 12(4):045022. PubMed ID: 28799523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Particle release from dental implants immediately after placement - An ex vivo comparison of different implant systems.
Barrak F; Li S; Muntane A; Bhatia M; Crossthwaite K; Jones J
Dent Mater; 2022 Jun; 38(6):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35461699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biological Safety Evaluation and Surface Modification of Biocompatible Ti-15Zr-4Nb Alloy.
Okazaki Y; Katsuda SI
Materials (Basel); 2021 Feb; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 33557312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis.
Pérez-Pevida E; Brizuela-Velasco A; Chávarri-Prado D; Jiménez-Garrudo A; Sánchez-Lasheras F; Solaberrieta-Méndez E; Diéguez-Pereira M; Fernández-González FJ; Dehesa-Ibarra B; Monticelli F
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():1850401. PubMed ID: 27995137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of Alveolar Bone Loss and Different Alloys on the Biomechanical Behavior of Internal-and External-Connection Implants: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Tsouknidas A; Lympoudi E; Michalakis K; Giannopoulos D; Michailidis N; Pissiotis A; Fytanidis D; Kugiumtzis D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):e30-42. PubMed ID: 26009924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study.
Bachiri A; Djebbar N; Boutabout B; Serier B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105723. PubMed ID: 32877819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The corrosion behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-13Nb-13Zr in protein solutions.
Khan MA; Williams RL; Williams DF
Biomaterials; 1999 Apr; 20(7):631-7. PubMed ID: 10208405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone.
Schwitalla AD; Abou-Emara M; Spintig T; Lackmann J; Müller WD
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25435385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biocompatibility and Degradation of a Low Elastic Modulus Ti-35Nb-3Zr Alloy: Nanosurface Engineering for Enhanced Degradation Resistance.
Mazigi O; Kannan MB; Xu J; Choe HC; Ye Q
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2017 Apr; 3(4):509-517. PubMed ID: 33429618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
