These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36557071)

  • 1. Urologic Complication after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Gynecology Oncology: A Single-Center Analysis and Narrative Review of the Literature.
    Capozzi VA; Monfardini L; Scarpelli E; Barresi G; Rotondella I; De Finis A; Scebba D; Maglietta G; Cianci S; Ghi T; Berretta R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Dec; 58(12):. PubMed ID: 36557071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
    Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: modified radical hysterectomy in intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer using peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery.
    Kimmig R; Aktas B; Buderath P; Wimberger P; Iannaccone A; Heubner M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 11():198. PubMed ID: 23947937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
    Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery].
    Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gynecological tumor triplicity.
    Mladěnka A; Šimetka O; Mladěnka P; Klát J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(6):445-447. PubMed ID: 30848150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive factors of severe perioperative morbidity of radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A French prospective multicentric cohort of 248 patients.
    Balaya V; Mathevet P; Magaud L; Delomenie M; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Huchon C; Bats AS; Lecuru F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):650-658. PubMed ID: 30910053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective assessment of urinary and bowel symptoms, and sexual function between laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy.
    Dogan NU; Kohler C; Pfiffer T; Plaikner A; Le X; Favero G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Mar; 31(3):484-489. PubMed ID: 33649018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical analysis of 23 cases with simultaneous double primary gynecological malignant tumors].
    He Y; Wang Y; Ji C; Liu Y; Wu YM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 57(5):352-360. PubMed ID: 35658326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic cancers: long-term follow-up of 355 patients.
    Zuna RE; Behrens A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Jul; 88(14):980-7. PubMed ID: 8667429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.