These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36559424)

  • 1. Using transcription-based detectors to emulate the behavior of sequential probability ratio-based concentration detectors.
    Chou CT
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Nov; 106(5-1):054403. PubMed ID: 36559424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal difference learning applied to sequential detection.
    Guo C; Kuh A
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 1997; 8(2):278-87. PubMed ID: 18255632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the triangular test to phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Bellissant E; Benichou J; Chastang C
    Stat Med; 1990 Aug; 9(8):907-17. PubMed ID: 2218193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the efficiency of the independent segments procedure: A direct comparison with sequential probability ratio tests.
    Erdfelder E; Schnuerch M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 34726467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sequential Probability Ratio Test: An efficient alternative to exact binomial testing for Clean Water Act 303(d) evaluation.
    Chen C; Gribble MO; Bartroff J; Bay SM; Goldstein L
    J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 192():89-93. PubMed ID: 28142127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of one-sample two-sided sequential t-tests for application in epidemiological studies.
    van der Tweel I; Kaaks R; van Noord PA
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2781-95. PubMed ID: 8981686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of phase II clinical trials in haematology and oncology: comparison of the triangular test to the usual methods.
    Benichou J; Bellissant E; Chastang C
    Stat Med; 1991 Jun; 10(6):989; discussion 989-90. PubMed ID: 1876789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test.
    Huebner AR; Finkelman MD
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):142-156. PubMed ID: 29881044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A conditional maximized sequential probability ratio test for pharmacovigilance.
    Li L; Kulldorff M
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):284-95. PubMed ID: 19941282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of competency in clinical measurement: comparison of two forms of sequential test and sensitivity of test error rates to parameter choice.
    Sims AJ; Keltie K; Burn J; Robson SC
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2013 Jul; 25(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 23559422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG Classification with a Sequential Decision-Making Method in Motor Imagery BCI.
    Liu R; Wang Y; Newman GI; Thakor NV; Ying S
    Int J Neural Syst; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1750046. PubMed ID: 29046111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous and group sequential conditional probability ratio tests for phase II clinical trials.
    Tan M; Xiong X
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2037-51. PubMed ID: 8896138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting Signals of Disproportionate Reporting from Singapore's Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting System: An Application of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test.
    Chan CL; Rudrappa S; Ang PS; Li SC; Evans SJW
    Drug Saf; 2017 Aug; 40(8):703-713. PubMed ID: 28455793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential Probability Ratio Testing with Power Projective Base Method Improves Decision-Making for BCI.
    Liu R; Wang Y; Wu X; Cheng J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():2948742. PubMed ID: 29348781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On Using Truncated Sequential Probability Ratio Test Boundaries for Monte Carlo Implementation of Hypothesis Tests.
    Fay MP; Kim HJ; Hachey M
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2007; 16(4):946-967. PubMed ID: 18633453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of LDA and SPRT on Clinical Dataset Classifications.
    Lee C; Nkounkou B; Huang CH
    Biomed Inform Insights; 2011 Apr; 4():1-7. PubMed ID: 21949476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal randomized RANSAC.
    Chum O; Matas J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Aug; 30(8):1472-82. PubMed ID: 18566499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stochastically curtailed generalized likelihood ratio: A new termination criterion for variable-length computerized classification tests.
    Huebner AR; Fina AD
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):549-61. PubMed ID: 24907003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Novel Hard Decision Based Simultaneous Target Tracking and Classification Approach.
    Cao W; Hui M; Wu Q
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29463046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.