These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36560065)

  • 1. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-Dimensional Feature Fusion Network for No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos.
    Jiang J; Wang X; Li B; Tian M; Yao H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Multi-Pooled, Saliency Weighted Deep Features and Decision Fusion.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Efficient Method for No-Reference Video Quality Assessment.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2021 Mar; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 34460711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-Reference Quality Assessment of Authentically Distorted Images Based on Local and Global Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2022 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 35735972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos.
    Seshadrinathan K; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 19846374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Natural Spatiotemporal Scene Statistics.
    Dendi SVR; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32275592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Video quality assessment using motion-compensated temporal filtering and manifold feature similarity.
    Song Y; Yu M; Jiang G; Shao F; Peng Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175798. PubMed ID: 28445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-Level Approach for No-Reference Consumer Video Quality Assessment.
    Korhonen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Dec; 28(12):5923-5938. PubMed ID: 31247551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blind Video Quality Prediction by Uncovering Human Video Perceptual Representation.
    Liao L; Xu K; Wu H; Chen C; Sun W; Yan Q; Jay Kuo CC; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():4998-5013. PubMed ID: 39236121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of Spatio-Temporal Modeling in Video Quality Assessment.
    Fang Y; Li Z; Yan J; Sui X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():2693-2702. PubMed ID: 37145945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salient motion features for video quality assessment.
    Ćulibrk D; Mirković M; Zlokolica V; Pokrić M; Crnojević V; Kukolj D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Apr; 20(4):948-58. PubMed ID: 20876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-Capture Distorted Videos.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment with Multi-Scale Orderless Pooling of Deep Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2021 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 39080900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.