These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36560355)
1. Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces. Mahmud D; Bennett ST; Zhu Z; Adamczyk PG; Wehner M; Veeramani D; Dai F Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. Okunola A; Afolabi A; Akanmu A; Jebelli H; Simikins S J Safety Res; 2024 Sep; 90():402-415. PubMed ID: 39251296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding contributing factors to exoskeleton use-intention in construction: a decision tree approach using results from an online survey. Kim S; Ojelade A; Moore A; Gutierrez N; Harris-Adamson C; Barr A; Srinivasan D; Rempel DM; Nussbaum MA Ergonomics; 2024 Sep; 67(9):1208-1221. PubMed ID: 38085690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons. Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceived benefits, barriers, perceptions, and readiness to use exoskeletons in the construction industry: Differences by demographic characteristics. Gutierrez N; Ojelade A; Kim S; Barr A; Akanmu A; Nussbaum MA; Harris-Adamson C Appl Ergon; 2024 Apr; 116():104199. PubMed ID: 38134719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room. Cha JS; Monfared S; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 31593495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An ergonomic assessment tool for evaluating the effect of back exoskeletons on injury risk. Zelik KE; Nurse CA; Schall MC; Sesek RF; Marino MC; Gallagher S Appl Ergon; 2022 Feb; 99():103619. PubMed ID: 34740072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures. Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of ergonomic solutions in construction. Dale AM; Jaegers L; Welch L; Barnidge E; Weaver N; Evanoff BA Am J Ind Med; 2017 Mar; 60(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 28195660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety voice for ergonomics (SAVE) project: protocol for a workplace cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce musculoskeletal disorders in masonry apprentices. Kincl LD; Anton D; Hess JA; Weeks DL BMC Public Health; 2016 Apr; 16():362. PubMed ID: 27121123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons. Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety Voice for Ergonomics (SAVE): Evaluation of a masonry apprenticeship training program. Hess JA; Kincl L; Weeks DL; Vaughan A; Anton D Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103083. PubMed ID: 32342883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insidious risks of wearable robots to worker safety and health: A scoping review. Okpala I; Nnaji C J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():382-394. PubMed ID: 38485381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of a Participatory Ergonomics Intervention With Wearable Technical Measurements of Physical Workload in the Construction Industry: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Brandt M; Madeleine P; Samani A; Ajslev JZ; Jakobsen MD; Sundstrup E; Andersen LL J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10272. PubMed ID: 30567694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research. Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals. Schall MC; Sesek RF; Cavuoto LA Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):351-362. PubMed ID: 29320232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort. Elstub LJ; Fine SJ; Zelik KE Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(24):. PubMed ID: 34948723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Barriers and facilitators to exoskeleton use in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Pinelli E; Zinno R; Barone G; Bragonzoni L Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Aug; 19(6):2355-2363. PubMed ID: 38009458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benchmarking commercially available soft and rigid passive back exoskeletons for an industrial workplace. Mohamed Refai MI; Moya-Esteban A; van Zijl L; van der Kooij H; Sartori M Wearable Technol; 2024; 5():e6. PubMed ID: 38510984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]