These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36561131)

  • 1. Computational Biology and
    Knudsen TB; Spencer RM; Pierro JD; Baker NC
    Curr Opin Toxicol; 2020 Dec; 23-24(Oct-Dec 2020):119-126. PubMed ID: 36561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children.
    Knudsen TB; Fitzpatrick SC; De Abrew KN; Birnbaum LS; Chappelle A; Daston GP; Dolinoy DC; Elder A; Euling S; Faustman EM; Fedinick KP; Franzosa JA; Haggard DE; Haws L; Kleinstreuer NC; Buck Louis GM; Mendrick DL; Rudel R; Saili KS; Schug TT; Tanguay RL; Turley AE; Wetmore BA; White KW; Zurlinden TJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2021 Apr; 180(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 33555348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploration of the DARTable Genome- a Resource Enabling Data-Driven NAMs for Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Prediction.
    Janowska-Sejda EI; Adeleye Y; Currie RA
    Front Toxicol; 2021; 3():806311. PubMed ID: 35295108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
    Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond AOPs: A Mechanistic Evaluation of NAMs in DART Testing.
    Rajagopal R; Baltazar MT; Carmichael PL; Dent MP; Head J; Li H; Muller I; Reynolds J; Sadh K; Simpson W; Spriggs S; White A; Kukic P
    Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():838466. PubMed ID: 35295212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing context appropriate toxicity testing approaches using new alternative methods (NAMs).
    Andersen ME; McMullen PD; Phillips MB; Yoon M; Pendse SN; Clewell HJ; Hartman JK; Moreau M; Becker RA; Clewell RA
    ALTEX; 2019; 36(4):523-534. PubMed ID: 31664457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of pharmaceutical toxicity prediction in computational toxicology.
    Uesawa Y
    Toxicol Res; 2024 Jan; 40(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 38223665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innovation in regulatory approaches for endocrine disrupting chemicals: The journey to risk assessment modernization in Canada.
    Barton-Maclaren TS; Wade M; Basu N; Bayen S; Grundy J; Marlatt V; Moore R; Parent L; Parrott J; Grigorova P; Pinsonnault-Cooper J; Langlois VS
    Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt C):112225. PubMed ID: 34666016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment.
    Kavlock RJ; Bahadori T; Barton-Maclaren TS; Gwinn MR; Rasenberg M; Thomas RS
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2018 May; 31(5):287-290. PubMed ID: 29600706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.
    Raies AB; Bajic VB
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci; 2016 Mar; 6(2):147-172. PubMed ID: 27066112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In silico toxicology protocols.
    Myatt GJ; Ahlberg E; Akahori Y; Allen D; Amberg A; Anger LT; Aptula A; Auerbach S; Beilke L; Bellion P; Benigni R; Bercu J; Booth ED; Bower D; Brigo A; Burden N; Cammerer Z; Cronin MTD; Cross KP; Custer L; Dettwiler M; Dobo K; Ford KA; Fortin MC; Gad-McDonald SE; Gellatly N; Gervais V; Glover KP; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Gutsell S; Hardy B; Harvey JS; Hillegass J; Honma M; Hsieh JH; Hsu CW; Hughes K; Johnson C; Jolly R; Jones D; Kemper R; Kenyon MO; Kim MT; Kruhlak NL; Kulkarni SA; Kümmerer K; Leavitt P; Majer B; Masten S; Miller S; Moser J; Mumtaz M; Muster W; Neilson L; Oprea TI; Patlewicz G; Paulino A; Lo Piparo E; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Richarz AN; Ruiz P; Schilter B; Serafimova R; Simpson W; Stavitskaya L; Stidl R; Suarez-Rodriguez D; Szabo DT; Teasdale A; Trejo-Martin A; Valentin JP; Vuorinen A; Wall BA; Watts P; White AT; Wichard J; Witt KL; Woolley A; Woolley D; Zwickl C; Hasselgren C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jul; 96():1-17. PubMed ID: 29678766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a reporting guideline for developmental and reproductive toxicology testing in
    van der Voet M; Teunis M; Louter-van de Haar J; Stigter N; Bhalla D; Rooseboom M; Wever KE; Krul C; Pieters R; Wildwater M; van Noort V
    Toxicol Res (Camb); 2021 Dec; 10(6):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 34950447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Silico Approaches in Predictive Genetic Toxicology.
    Sinha M; Dhawan A; Parthasarathi R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():351-373. PubMed ID: 31473971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.
    Williams AJ; Lambert JC; Thayer K; Dorne JCM
    Environ Int; 2021 Sep; 154():106566. PubMed ID: 33934018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is computational toxicology withering on the vine?
    Combes RD
    Arch Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 84(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 20204328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.
    Escher SE; Kamp H; Bennekou SH; Bitsch A; Fisher C; Graepel R; Hengstler JG; Herzler M; Knight D; Leist M; Norinder U; Ouédraogo G; Pastor M; Stuard S; White A; Zdrazil B; van de Water B; Kroese D
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Dec; 93(12):3643-3667. PubMed ID: 31781791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value and limitation of structure-based profilers to characterize developmental and reproductive toxicity potential.
    Manganelli S; Schilter B; Scholz G; Benfenati E; Lo Piparo E
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 94(3):939-954. PubMed ID: 32100055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory decisions for chemical safety: Report from an EPAA Deep Dive Workshop.
    Westmoreland C; Bender HJ; Doe JE; Jacobs MN; Kass GEN; Madia F; Mahony C; Manou I; Maxwell G; Prieto P; Roggeband R; Sobanski T; Schütte K; Worth AP; Zvonar Z; Cronin MTD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Nov; 135():105261. PubMed ID: 36103951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.