These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36562232)
1. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision]. Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision]. Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection]. Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision. Simpson G; Marks T; Blacker S; Smith D; Walsh C Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32594270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review. Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Yamaoka Y; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Torii K; Koido K; Mori K Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):557-566. PubMed ID: 30006838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer. Chau J; Solomon J; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Lee L Surg Endosc; 2020 Oct; 34(10):4609-4615. PubMed ID: 31620910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study. Kim JY; Kim YW; Kim NK; Hur H; Lee K; Min BS; Cho HJ Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 22002269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer. Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of transabdominal total mesorectal excision difficulty according to the angle of pelvic floor muscle. Lee JM; Han YD; Cho MS; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3043-3050. PubMed ID: 31482361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision]. Dou R; Sun W; Luo S; Hou Y; Zhang C; Kang L Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 22(3):246-254. PubMed ID: 30919377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer. Chen J; Sun Y; Chi P; Sun B Surg Today; 2021 Jul; 51(7):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 33420827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis]. Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and exploring the technical advantages of robotic surgery. Guo F; Xia C; Wang Z; Wang R; Gao J; Meng Y; Pan J; Zhang Q; Ren S Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1303686. PubMed ID: 38347843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumour, narrow pelvis and surgery specific factors for total mesorectal excision quality and morbidity following rectal cancer resection. Tschann P; Brock T; Weigl MP; Clemens P; Brunner W; Attenberger C; Königsrainer I; Emmanuel K; Konschake M; Jäger T BJS Open; 2023 Nov; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 38006203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional visualization of the total mesorectal excision plane for dissection in rectal cancer surgery and its ability to predict surgical difficulty. Nagai Y; Kawai K; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Abe S; Sonoda H; Yoshioka Y; Shinagawa T; Ishihara S Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2130. PubMed ID: 36747080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mesorectal fat area and mesorectal area affect the surgical difficulty of robotic-assisted mesorectal excision and intersphincteric resection respectively in different ways. Huang S; Chen M; Deng Y; Wang X; Lu X; Jiang W; Huang Y; Chi P Colorectal Dis; 2020 Sep; 22(9):1130-1138. PubMed ID: 32040248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]