These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36562816)
1. The efficiency of machine learning-assisted platform for article screening in systematic reviews in orthopaedics. Muthu S Int Orthop; 2023 Feb; 47(2):551-556. PubMed ID: 36562816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study. Yamada T; Yoneoka D; Hiraike Y; Hino K; Toyoshiba H; Shishido A; Noma H; Shojima N; Yamauchi T J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e22422. PubMed ID: 33262102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records. Ferdinands G; Schram R; de Bruin J; Bagheri A; Oberski DL; Tummers L; Teijema JJ; van de Schoot R Syst Rev; 2023 Jun; 12(1):100. PubMed ID: 37340494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes. Hamel C; Kelly SE; Thavorn K; Rice DB; Wells GA; Hutton B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):256. PubMed ID: 33059590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews. Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the article screening efficiency of artificial intelligence for Systematic Reviews. Chan YT; Abad JE; Dibart S; Kernitsky JR J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105259. PubMed ID: 39067652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial Commentary: Machine Learning in Orthopaedics: Venturing Into the Valley of Despair. Wellington IJ; Cote MP Arthroscopy; 2022 Sep; 38(9):2767-2768. PubMed ID: 36064282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predicting orthopaedic outcomes. Bayliss L; Jones LD Bone Joint J; 2019 Dec; 101-B(12):1476-1478. PubMed ID: 31786999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning to optimize literature screening in medical guideline development. Harmsen W; de Groot J; Harkema A; van Dusseldorp I; de Bruin J; van den Brand S; van de Schoot R Syst Rev; 2024 Jul; 13(1):177. PubMed ID: 38992684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review. Mantelakis A; Khajuria A Syst Rev; 2020 Feb; 9(1):44. PubMed ID: 32111260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics: A Clinically Focused Review of Machine Learning Techniques. Cho B; Geng E; Arvind V; Valliani AA; Tang JE; Schwartz J; Dominy C; Cho SK; Kim JS JBJS Rev; 2022 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 35302963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence and machine learning: an introduction for orthopaedic surgeons. Martin RK; Ley C; Pareek A; Groll A; Tischer T; Seil R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Feb; 30(2):361-364. PubMed ID: 34528133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iterative guided machine learning-assisted systematic literature reviews: a diabetes case study. Zimmerman J; Soler RE; Lavinder J; Murphy S; Atkins C; Hulbert L; Lusk R; Ng BP Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 10(1):97. PubMed ID: 33810798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human-Comparable Sensitivity of Large Language Models in Identifying Eligible Studies Through Title and Abstract Screening: 3-Layer Strategy Using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for Systematic Reviews. Matsui K; Utsumi T; Aoki Y; Maruki T; Takeshima M; Takaesu Y J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e52758. PubMed ID: 39151163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-reviewer reliability of human literature reviewing and implications for the introduction of machine-assisted systematic reviews: a mixed-methods review. Hanegraaf P; Wondimu A; Mosselman JJ; de Jong R; Abogunrin S; Queiros L; Lane M; Postma MJ; Boersma C; van der Schans J BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076912. PubMed ID: 38508610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Citation screening using crowdsourcing and machine learning produced accurate results: Evaluation of Cochrane's modified Screen4Me service. Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Affengruber L; Gartlehner G J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():23-31. PubMed ID: 33007457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool. Gates A; Johnson C; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):45. PubMed ID: 29530097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]