183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36563872)
1. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study).
Gagyor D; Kalis V; Smazinka M; Rusavy Z; Pilka R; Ismail KM
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 33596878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Cerclage Sacrohysteropexy: Comparing a Novel Technique for Sacrohysteropexy to Traditional Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.
Armstrong KL; Modest AM; Rosenblatt PL
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e315-e320. PubMed ID: 32675629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Isenlik BS; Aksoy O; Erol O; Mulayim B
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 35737006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.
Chen Y; Hua K
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
Nosti PA; Carter CM; Sokol AI; Tefera E; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Gutman RE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse.
Grinstein E; Abdelkhalek Y; Veit-Rubin N; Gluck O; Deval B
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 34125240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy.
Gluck O; Rusavy Z; Grinstein E; Abdelkhalek Y; Deval B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):753-758. PubMed ID: 35123043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Campagna G; Vacca L; Panico G; Rumolo V; Caramazza D; Lombisani A; Rossitto C; Gadonneix P; Scambia G; Ercoli A
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
