These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36563927)

  • 41. Resolution of contradiction between in silico predictions and Ames test results for four pharmaceutically relevant impurities.
    Gunther WC; Kenyon MO; Cheung JR; Dugger RW; Dobo KL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91():68-76. PubMed ID: 29061373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines.
    Devillers J; Mombelli E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):753-69. PubMed ID: 21120760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Utility of published DNA reactivity alerts.
    Myden A; Guesne SJ; Cayley A; Williams RV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():77-86. PubMed ID: 28549899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity.
    Bakhtyari NG; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Martin T; Young D
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2013; 31(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 23534394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Application of SAR methods to non-congeneric data bases associated with carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: issues and approaches.
    Richard AM
    Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):73-97. PubMed ID: 7508549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
    Amberg A; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Dowdy E; Ford KA; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Nicolette J; Plaper A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():13-24. PubMed ID: 26877192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity.
    Hansen K; Mika S; Schroeter T; Sutter A; ter Laak A; Steger-Hartmann T; Heinrich N; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2077-81. PubMed ID: 19702240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of Different Methods for Identification of Structural Alerts Using Chemical Ames Mutagenicity Data Set as a Benchmark.
    Yang H; Li J; Wu Z; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1355-1364. PubMed ID: 28485959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Chemistry-Wide Association Studies (CWAS): A Novel Framework for Identifying and Interpreting Structure-Activity Relationships.
    Low YS; Alves VM; Fourches D; Sedykh A; Andrade CH; Muratov EN; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2203-2213. PubMed ID: 30376324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mutagenicity in a Molecule: Identification of Core Structural Features of Mutagenicity Using a Scaffold Analysis.
    Hsu KH; Su BH; Tu YS; Lin OA; Tseng YJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148900. PubMed ID: 26863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In silico methods combined with expert knowledge rule out mutagenic potential of pharmaceutical impurities: an industry survey.
    Dobo KL; Greene N; Fred C; Glowienke S; Harvey JS; Hasselgren C; Jolly R; Kenyon MO; Munzner JB; Muster W; Neft R; Reddy MV; White AT; Weiner S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 62(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 22321701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of in silico models for prioritization of heat-induced food contaminants in mutagenicity and carcinogenicity testing.
    Frenzel F; Buhrke T; Wenzel I; Andrack J; Hielscher J; Lampen A
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 91(9):3157-3174. PubMed ID: 28091709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mutagenic activity of a series of synthetic and naturally occurring heterocyclic amines in Salmonella.
    Smith C; Payne V; Doolittle DJ; Debnath AK; Lawlor T; Hansch C
    Mutat Res; 1992 May; 279(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 1374534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of In Silico Models for Mutagenicity Prediction of Food Contact Materials.
    Van Bossuyt M; Van Hoeck E; Raitano G; Vanhaecke T; Benfenati E; Mertens B; Rogiers V
    Toxicol Sci; 2018 Jun; 163(2):632-638. PubMed ID: 29579255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.
    Modi S; Li J; Malcomber S; Moore C; Scott A; White A; Carmichael P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1017-33. PubMed ID: 22918548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?
    Gini G; Zanoli F; Gamba A; Raitano G; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):617-642. PubMed ID: 31460798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Strategy proposal using QSAR models to approach mutagenicity assessment of non intentionally added substances in recycled plastic resins.
    Djelassi I; Lancia P; Thuillier I; Ginestar J; Fioravanzo E; Baleydier A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 May; 187():114597. PubMed ID: 38492856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.
    Golbamaki A; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():201-215. PubMed ID: 35188634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The application of structure-activity relationships to the prediction of the mutagenic activity of chemicals.
    Judson P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():1-19. PubMed ID: 22147565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determination of a positive response in the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay.
    Zeiger E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2023 Apr; 64(4):250-258. PubMed ID: 36916210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.